Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 37

[Hope4More]

Who "did" he interview?

Just JA. That's it. And the DT as a whole, for the retrial? Bishop Parker. And iirc, MDLR did the nameless faceless affids.

 

[Nali87]

BK.....G: doesn't remember we said the Hughes shouldn't be interviewed, just that there were others they were more interested in interviewing.

Pfff. Yet they spent days on the e-mails the Hughes sent to Travis. Talking about the Hughes, really wish they would have waited after sentencing to talk about this book they're writing. :sigh:

 

[Nosey Parker]

Just JA. That's it. And the DT as a whole, for the retrial? Bishop Parker.

and Marc the Snark, in the European Colony of New Zealand.

ETA: during a handy lecture tour

 

[memoriesbymichelle]

So by 'staffing' do we infer Geffner, Samuels, AVL and Fonesca, in a think tank?

and Willmott, Nurmi, and Jodi

 

[tlckgram]

So by 'staffing' do we infer Geffner, Samuels, AVL and Fonesca, in a think tank?

Headed of course by CMJA

 

[pacnwgal]

:facepalm:

What the heck does that mean?

The "staff" thought traveling to New Zealand might be more "useful".

 

[Dmacky]

It was a staffing issue.

It wasn't useful.

I can't remember if we considered it.

They had secondary gain... they are writing a book.

For Pete sake- which one is it Dr Geffner?

According to him, he can use of 2 of these questions for his answer :smile:

 

[MissHaley]

It was a staffing issue.

It wasn't useful.

I can't remember if we considered it.

They had secondary gain... they are writing a book.

For Pete sake- which one is it Dr Geffner?

then add to it - I don't remember reading Sky's interview. Then, yes I watched her 48 hr interview. WTH?

 

[Hope4More]

Pfff. Yet they spent days on the e-mails the Hughes sent to Travis. Talking about the Hughes, really wish they would have waited after sentencing to talk about this book they're writing. :sigh:

Me too. Not because of Geffy's absurd slam of secondary gain, but because it would be the honorable thing to do, to not give even the appearance of wanting to exploit trial publicity, for any reason.

 

[Becky Sharp]

and Marc the Snark, in the European Colony of New Zealand.

ETA: during a handy lecture tour

I wonder if they even bothered to do that.

 

[DEPUTYDAWG]

From News20:

Tammy Rose ‏@News20Chopper · 2m2 minutes ago

#JodiArias' smiling is fading fast.


:happydance::happydance::happydance: LOL !

That tweet just made my day!!!!!

 

[wendiesan]

Is that even legal? Isnt there a rule that the test must be given a certain way.

Who gives Geff the power to change the testing around and do it his own way?

That seems like an ethical violation to me.

If all doctors did this would it not cause confusion. I thought all tests were to be clear if another doctor looked at them?

It allows replication. No replication possible in this case, so it can't be repeated to prove or disprove the results. It's basic scientific method of investigation. If the test is not replicable, the results could be invalid. IMO.

 

[Nosey Parker]

I wonder if they even bothered to do that.

Well, if Geffner did meet with him while on a speaking engagement, he certainly didn't follow up on any 'fact finding' - thank goodness!

 

[TexMex]

Jodi Arias Updates @JodiAnnArias
· 1h 1 hour ago
JM is acting like a clown. He must've minored in theater in law school.


Jodi Arias Updates @JodiAnnArias
· 1h 1 hour ago
JM likes to accuse Defense experts of being hired guns. But it's quite obvious who the real hired gun is.

I would say she is trying to project to twitter that she is NOT nervous so she must be nervous.

Obviously the mitigation specialist has lots of time on her paws

 

[Dmacky]

So by 'staffing' do we infer Geffner, Samuels, AVL and Fonesca, in a think tank?

Nay. He means Jodi. :giggle:

 

[tlckgram]

If anyone noted the look on Juror #1's face, I didn't see it posted on twitter feed or here or BK posting. Anybody?? How did the juror react?

 

[pacnwgal]

then add to it - I don't remember reading Sky's interview. Then, yes I watched her 48 hr interview. WTH?

Does anyone remember if this jury has seen Sky's clips from the 48 hour interview? How in the world, IMHO, could anyone (Geffner) watch that interview and not remember all of those creepy incidents, such as standing outside the door, etc...? This is so insulting to the jury!

 

[Nosey Parker]

Nay. He means Jodi. :giggle:

But she's 'the boss'. I don't think she would care to be considered staffing.

 

[04009margaret]

dadasdmask.cnadfpqoiwerjkqpdfjff!!!!!

:giggle: C'mon, spit it out Hope. :lol:

 

[MissHaley]

There would be no legal reason to being a mitigation specialist up to speed when there are no mitigators. Hopefully, they will not renew her contract.

Someone answered this & what I remember is that even tho the contract is up & not renewed, if they are in an active case, they will remain on it until verdict. No replacing.