Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So this means Jodi has to immediately stop testifying in secrecy??? What happens now? Do they move on to the next witness or open the court? Will her identity be revealed??? Such suspense...
I hope JSS learns from this and grows a spine. In her attempt to bend over backwards to avoid an appeal, she actually subjected herself to one.
Hopefully someone will link to the order.
From one of the tweets above, it sounds like the court went beyond just ruling on the stay.
Wait. I'm confused. So they ruledon the stay. The identity and transcript wom't be released till after they rule on the media's motion?
BBM: Quick Question AZL
Could the appellate court have consolidated both issues, as the trial is in progress ?
That would make the most sense, IMO: rule on the secret witness -- and -- rule on the stay -- because if not for the "secret witness" a stay would not have been requested.
I hope that made sense !
Thanks !
Maybe. We need to see the order to be sure.
Well, it's only a stay of secret testimony. The rest of the trial can go on but since Nurmi implied he wanted his whole case sealed I don't know what he plans to do now.
:scared::scared::scared::scared::scared:Well, it's only a stay of secret testimony. The rest of the trial can go on but since Nurmi implied he wanted his whole case sealed I don't know what he plans to do now.
It will only delay the trial if JA has zero not-secret witness for her mitigation case. JSS is free to move forward with not-secret witnesses.
I hope JSS learns from this and grows a spine. In her attempt to bend over backwards to avoid an appeal, she actually subjected herself to one.
So what happens if Nurmi does like last time and he claims his witnesses will now refuse to testify and call them off? Can/will the judge subpoena them?