Why do you think it is related to the family business ?Yes of course it could be. I am just more personaly swayed towards a targeted attack due to the type of family business.
Why do you think it is related to the family business ?Yes of course it could be. I am just more personaly swayed towards a targeted attack due to the type of family business.
Many possibilities that could relate to the family business while it could be a very reputable business. Having unwanted approaches from organised crime is one possibility some other posters have suggested.Why do you think it is related to the family business ?
But...Many possibilities that could relate to the family business while it could be a very reputable business. Having unwanted approaches from organised crime is one possibility some other posters have suggested.
There is nothing new that I can see.New story released by MSM <modsnip - not an approved source>
Anything is possible, you would think there would have been other evidence of threats , violence , property damage and why target her ?Many possibilities that could relate to the family business while it could be a very reputable business. Having unwanted approaches from organised crime is one possibility some other posters have suggested.
Australian history on organised crime gangs shows otherwise.But...
what would the criminal world achieve by this ???
Except scandal all over the country and abroad.
Media attention and all kinds of LE focusing on them.
IMO
Criminals don't act emotionally but cunningly.
This crime shows unbalanced and angry mindset.
I mean, what normal person even thinks to do a thing like this?
JMO
WellAustralian history on organised crime gangs shows otherwise.
My apology Bats and all, something had moved up my news feed tonight, but I think just from recent search history, my apologies.There is nothing new that I can see.
bbm, I'm not convinced the police don't have Sam on CCTV, or good reason to believe she might be (not in the forest of course) after Dt. Superintendent Hatt specifically mentioned that they have 12k hours of CCTV to look through. That seems like a huge number that must cover quite a bit of area and potentially time too (ie days after she went missing a damaged car being moved or something). It might mean nothing but it sounded to me like they still think there is a possibility they will find her or someone/thing suspicious on camera somewhere.
True! But at the dinner party night before, she did discuss that she was going on a run the next day (I haven’t seen this reported, only commented on), which may mean she discussed on that night where that run would be. Which potentially makes those guests present a smaller focus group for police.That's true, but you need to remember that Samantha had the choice to run in any direction when she left her home. If someone was intrinsically planning her abduction, they'd need to cover off many different directions that she may choose to run.
I'm sure there are people out there that know a particular area. That may have thought for years that it would be easy to make someone disappear in the area that they are very familiar with.
Well
I know nothing about these matters as I live faaaar away.
When I think of Australia I see sweet koalas in my mind hahaha
I would focus on theatre crowd she was connected with.
Many artists have inflated egos and are narcissistic types.
JMO
But how would they know that she started at 7 a.m. on Sunday?It's possible that whoever took Sam had been watching her for a while to learn her routine and scope out some likely areas. Especially if they had an accomplice, it wouldn't be that difficult for them to watch her leave on her run and communicate which way she went, giving them an idea of which way she was heading. Perp A positions themselves near her home, watches her leave, calls or texts Perp B to let them know she headed into the forest, Perp B stages themselves at a spot they think she's likely going to end up. If she veers off track and goes in a direction they don't suspect, fair enough, they can try again tomorrow. Do this long enough and eventually they'll be successful.
We don’t know that there is 2 perps ?It's possible that whoever took Sam had been watching her for a while to learn her routine and scope out some likely areas. Especially if they had an accomplice, it wouldn't be that difficult for them to watch her leave on her run and communicate which way she went, giving them an idea of which way she was heading. Perp A positions themselves near her home, watches her leave, calls or texts Perp B to let them know she headed into the forest, Perp B stages themselves at a spot they think she's likely going to end up. If she veers off track and goes in a direction they don't suspect, fair enough, they can try again tomorrow. Do this long enough and eventually they'll be successful.
A parent of a child actor who was unhappy that their child wasn’t cast in a recent production? Jealousy? i don’t feel like that is what happened here but anything is possible.I would focus on theatre crowd she was connected with.
Many artists have inflated egos and are narcissistic types.
JMO