D
Deleted member 339914
Guest
I also feel like someone at the dinner/assoc with the business has unwittingly mentioned info on Sam to someone connected to the kidnappers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was stated that there was a lot of "movement" at the house that morning.
What might be more imminent though could be an early morning raid with search warrants.
which is why other theories than the cliche are much higher on my list of likely explanations. But not ruling anything out.
It doesn't look good
Now, I'm not sure Samantha will be ever found.
Perhaps it was a vehicle that already had damage….at a repair shop????Perhaps it was damaged by SM putting up a fight? Maybe they found evidence of the struggle at the scene.
Why do you believe there was a 'script'? Show invites some 'experts' they speculate off the top of their heads. IMO, these shows are not scripted.
JMO
Watching Under Investigation now. These are just the thoughts I had while watching. So spoilers I guess.
- I appreciate the reconstruction clips hopefully they will help jog someones memory especially since the police haven't done the standard mannequin dressed in similar clothing.
- Having watched UI episodes before I knew not to expect any new case breaking info but this does help somewhat solidify the timeline.
- Props to Sissy for going on national TV and telling a story which is obviously still very traumatic to her.
- I agree it is interesting that Sissy's attacker was barefoot although I don't think it automatically means he had mental issues.
- I wonder if the shoes worn by the woman in the reconstruction are similar to Sam's because the are somewhat distinctive.
- How many other people have been confronted by the same man who attacked Sissy and managed to get away and haven't reported it.
- I think IF there is a man living out there in the bush attacking people he's probably not keeping up with current News reports.
- Arghhh if you were just gonna say Sissy's attack wasn't connected to Sam's why bring her on the show? She was just filler cos they didn't have enough info to actually make an episode.
Watching the Under Investigation show, the mine shaft theory can be 99.99% ruled out. They can pinpoint to within a few metres where everything unfolded and it was on a well beaten track with the phone and watch data.
The "experts" don't seem to think so, they all sound like they are united on this.I feel so very strongly that Sam is alive and being held captive. I pray that the police are having a really close look at anyone in the area with form on drugs and assault of women. The police should do some raids. I feel it's druggo hoons with hunting dogs ... that scene.
This would explain the lack of ongoing personal appeals to the publicI feel so very strongly that Sam is alive and being held captive. I pray that the police are having a really close look at anyone in the area with form on drugs and assault of women. The police should do some raids. I feel it's druggo hoons with hunting dogs ... that scene.
taking a watch off would cause a watch to behave like that tooThe "experts" don't seem to think so, they all sound like they are united on this.
My guess is there was a big increase in her heart rate from the watch just prior to a "flatline".
It is so sad that Sam no longer appears to be with us and was removed from the location in a car, possibly a vehicle with damage to it.
The fact that this specific info has been released leads me to believe they have a pretty good idea of who is behind this and they are slowly building the case before an arrest.
IMO it’s reasonable to assume MM and perhaps kids, others were coming/going searching and checking the area from as early as 9.30am, for at least an hour or two before calling police around 11? And possibly some normal Sunday activity, eg maybe MM popped out for some milk and the paper before realising SM was missing. They may even have been checking earlier say called some time after 8 and discovered SM was unreachable, checked FindMy and couldn’t see any trace of mum. We use FindMy and Life360 in our family to see who is where.I think it was stated that there was a lot of movement throughout the day? I don't think Mark Hatt was specific on the times of day of the movement.
imo
The "experts" don't seem to think so, they all sound like they are united on this.
They have the phone and watch data though and this would be very telling. One of them said they know where the event happened within a few metres.Except criminal psychologist Dr Peter Ashkar gave a really big push for a kidnapping theory at the end of the show.
Exactly. I've said several times that the vehicle could easily be one awaiting repairs from the panel beaters.Perhaps it was a vehicle that already had damage….at a repair shop????
They have the phone and watch data though and this would be very telling. One of them said they know where the event happened within a few metres.
So...
Which is on top on your list????
It would make more sense to use one of the "loan cars" (if they use loan cars and one was available) instead an actual customer car.Exactly. I've said several times that the vehicle could easily be one awaiting repairs from the panel beaters.