ISWMLE
Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2014
- Messages
- 263
- Reaction score
- 3
This case shook/destroyed any confidence I previously had regarding GPS monitoring. This offender was mandated to home arrest and left home (unauthorized) often. While out and about, he shot a young girl, Raven. The trial was a real eye opener revealing the shortcomings of this technology. IMO, this should only be employed for the lowest risk offender. IMO, the Ms are not low risk.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/baltimore-...company-technology-glitches/story?id=16610527
http://articles.baltimoresun.com/20..._1_home-monitoring-home-detention-davis-trial
i remember the failing gps device in the Jaycee Dugard case :
'Neither Garrido's regular interviews with his parole agent nor mandated visits, both scheduled and surprise, by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation revealed the crime. The GPS device that tracked Phillip's movement certainly didn't note that he'd imprisoned and raped a missing girl at his own residence.'
http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/sexual_assault/jaycee_dugard/6.html