NFYIAMY
Verified Expert
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2011
- Messages
- 723
- Reaction score
- 187
Did TM and SM seem to interact with each other?
Not at all.
Did TM and SM seem to interact with each other?
Didn't LE say her phone may have had activity as late at 6:00 a.m.? I know I've read that in MSM several times. I'm a bit confused about that now though.
Hoppy, what did they do when he said DENIED?
Not at all.
Tooooo many pages for me to catch up on. I was there today - any questions? I don't know what all has been posted - but did see a couple of things here that aren't quite exactly right (at quick glance over).
I think the thing that caught my attention the most was the solicitor talking about how SM had stated that he and TM were in an agreement that (during a SIX MONTH period):
She would go to work with SM.
She had control of all his social media.
She had control of his cell phone - and had passcoded it to he couldn't get into it.
That he was handcuffed to the bed at night (willingly) so he wouldn't leave the home.
That seemed just CRAZY!
I think the thing that caught my attention the most was the solicitor talking about how SM had stated that he and TM were in an agreement that (during a SIX MONTH period):
She would go to work with SM.
She had control of all his social media.
She had control of his cell phone - and had passcoded it to he couldn't get into it.
That he was handcuffed to the bed at night (willingly) so he wouldn't leave the home.
That seemed just CRAZY!
I think the thing that caught my attention the most was the solicitor talking about how SM had stated that he and TM were in an agreement that (during a SIX MONTH period):
She would go to work with SM.
She had control of all his social media.
She had control of his cell phone - and had passcoded it to he couldn't get into it.
That he was handcuffed to the bed at night (willingly) so he wouldn't leave the home.
That seemed just CRAZY!
Thank you for your support of the Elvis family, and for offering your insight.
Can you fill us in on TE's comments? Twitters said he was speaking too softly to hear much.
Sent from my SM-G730V using Tapatalk
I think the thing that caught my attention the most was the solicitor talking about how SM had stated that he and TM were in an agreement that (during a SIX MONTH period):
She would go to work with SM.
She had control of all his social media.
She had control of his cell phone - and had passcoded it to he couldn't get into it.
That he was handcuffed to the bed at night (willingly) so he wouldn't leave the home.
That seemed just CRAZY!
http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/2014/03/17/4102373/moorers-bond-denied.h
SM seriously has a mickey tie on? I am without words.
I think the thing that caught my attention the most was the solicitor talking about how SM had stated that he and TM were in an agreement that (during a SIX MONTH period):
She would go to work with SM.
She had control of all his social media.
She had control of his cell phone - and had passcoded it to he couldn't get into it.
That he was handcuffed to the bed at night (willingly) so he wouldn't leave the home.
That seemed just CRAZY!
Done lol omg I cannot believe I did that lol
Wait...
Anyone else thinking that she's gonna try the abused woman route? That Sidney took it too far? That she's frightened enough of him to be put into a different facility?
Curious..
http://www.myhorrynews.com/news/crime/article_d584ebf6-9ff2-11e3-9efb-001a4bcf6878.html
Wait...
I'm reading posts that say Tammy wasn't in jail garb.
So, not in jail clothes, and although she shows up in VINELINK as @ J Reuben Long detention center, she's supposedly NOT - but rather, in the Georgetown jail -because she fears for her safety. (see link below)
Then today, her atty had qualms about her and Sidney being referenced as "they" - hmmm..
Anyone else thinking that she's gonna try the abused woman route? That Sidney took it too far? That she's frightened enough of him to be put into a different facility?
Curious..
http://www.myhorrynews.com/news/crime/article_d584ebf6-9ff2-11e3-9efb-001a4bcf6878.html
I think the thing that caught my attention the most was the solicitor talking about how SM had stated that he and TM were in an agreement that (during a SIX MONTH period):
She would go to work with SM.
She had control of all his social media.
She had control of his cell phone - and had passcoded it to he couldn't get into it.
That he was handcuffed to the bed at night (willingly) so he wouldn't leave the home.
That seemed just CRAZY!