Okay, so playing these extremely violent games has no impact on kids?
This is like saying explicit lyrics causes sex and violence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay, so playing these extremely violent games has no impact on kids?
That's just not the case - Brenda Spencer was 16 years old in 1979 when she killed two and injured several others (including children) during a sniper attack on an elementary school with a rifle her father had given her for Christmas. And she is far from alone in being a young killer committing senseless crimes when allowed access to a lethal weapon.This is extremely heartbreaking. But senseless killings like this did not happen 15 years ago, especially with the suspects/killers being so young.
These young people are desensitized by playing stupid video games where you kill people and the more people you kill earns you a higher score.
Sad but true.
While Doom and other violent video games have been blamed for nationally covered school shootings, 2008 research featured by Greater Good Science Center[42] shows that the two are not closely related. Harvard medical school researchers Cheryl Olson and Lawrence Kutner found that violent video games did not correlate to school shootings. The U.S. Secret Service and Department of Education analyzed 37 incidents of school violence and sought to develop a profile of school shooters, they discovered that the most common traits among shooters were that they were male and had histories of depression and attempted suicide. While many of the killers—like the vast majority of young teenage boys—did play video games, this study did not find a relationship between game play and school shootings. In fact, only one eighth of the shooters showed any special interest in violent video games; far less than the number of shooters who seemed attracted to books and movies with violent content.[43]
Like I do? Huh? Please explain. You lost me on this one.
Not to speak for EllieBee, I think she meant that giving drugs and a gun to someone on his birthday "is the sort of thing one does" -- jokingly, that is. I don't think she was saying that you personally are in the habit of giving guns and pills as birthday presents.
Right, but there was no attempt to "intimidate or coerce a civilian population." What was the intimidation -- to discourage people from being black or going to church? Where was the coercion?
This was a one-off. He said he 'wanted to kill black people' -- with no purpose declared.
As a hate crime, he will be tried federally and it will be a capital offense.
Not to speak for EllieBee, I think she meant that giving drugs and a gun to someone on his birthday "is the sort of thing one does" -- jokingly, that is. I don't think she was saying that you personally are in the habit of giving guns and pills as birthday presents.
That's just not the case - Brenda Spencer was 16 years old in 1979 when she killed two and injured several others (including children) during a sniper attack on an elementary school with a rifle her father had given her for Christmas. And she is far from alone in being a young killer committing senseless crimes when allowed access to a lethal weapon.
Overall violent crime and homicide is going down in developed countries, and violent movies and video games are as popular as ever. But mass shootings are on the rise in America. I don't think video games are the problem. I don't know what the problem is either.
I am not seeing were he was given the gun, but was given money and he bought a gun. Is there a link that the gun was bought for him or did that get twisted?
Meeks said Roof also told him that he had used birthday money from his parents to buy a gun and that he had "a plan." He didn't elaborate on what it was, but Meeks said he was worried — and said he knew Roof had the "Glock" — a .45 caliber pistol — in the trunk of his car.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/06/19/survivors-charleston-church-shooting-played-dead-friends-say/
Once again, Stewart nailed it.
I haven't seen anyone claim this horrible crime wasn't motivated by racial hatred. Discussions, not just here, will continue as to whether Roof was a terrorist, a white suprematist, evil or mentally unbalanced. I don't think these characterizations are mutually exclusive. There's "something wrong" with the mind of anyone who commits mass murder with a sick desire to gain some kind of relevance or "fame". If the reports from friends are accurate that Roof hoped to start a "helter skelter" style race war, bizarre as that plan might be, I don't see how that doesn't qualify as terrorism. Roof is not merely biased. He is a extreme white suprematist who apparently wanted to murder based on race and a twisted political ideology. Even among the most depraved, there are few who would target a peaceful bible school meeting of innocents, including a 87 year old woman and a 5 year old child. If that isn't evil, what is?
I don't think tolerating offensive jokes, responding to identity politics, violent video games or a host of other things many find objectionable can be blamed. If it's true as has been reported that a search of Roof's room uncovered skin head/white supremacy literature and paraphernalia, that could explain a lot. The recruitment tools and propaganda of these hate groups are no less insidious or dangerous than Isis recruitment methods. Roof repeated but failed to complete the ninth grade before dropping out. Having no skills or aptitude to suceed, it seems likely that he could have been filled with rage and chose to blame his problems on others, in this case, people of another race. Add drug addiction to the mix, and he looks like, imo, a likely recruit for the skin head movement. This is all my opinion only, and meant in no way to excuse or mitigate Roof's actions. He is 100% responsible for his evil deeds, but it could explain how Roof evolved from racist loser to mass murderer. All MOO