BBM - this makes sense to me as the death certificate states that Paul’s residence was at Moselle.Paul’s apartment was in Columbia, and Moselle was in Islandton. That’s almost a 2 hour drive. I believe he was home for the summer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BBM - this makes sense to me as the death certificate states that Paul’s residence was at Moselle.Paul’s apartment was in Columbia, and Moselle was in Islandton. That’s almost a 2 hour drive. I believe he was home for the summer.
The section of what video or article? ThanksOne of them did say there was a piece of his shirt...then talked about the micro flecks of that paint and the possiblity that color matched an, IIRC, off road type vehicle of someone in the Murdaugh family. It was said in the section where they were discussing SS.
The Off The Cuff retired NYPD cops that swedeheart just linked within the last 4 pages.The section of what video or article? Thanks
This one, sorry I didnt link it directly before
In the situation described in my previous post, AM’s termination was, no doubt, a constructive firing. In professional firms (e.g., law firms, accounting firms, medical practices, etc.), it is often opted, as a professional courtesy (even if not deserved), to allow a person to resign in the face of being otherwise fired. One way, or another (i.e., fired, suspended, or resigned), he was likely going to be walked out of that building after that meeting.Yes I know that’s what was reported but if he had been accused of embezzling/misappropriating funds, one would think the wording would be that the law firm then fired him (or at least suspended him until a forensic accountant did their analysis). I place more emphasis on the wording that he RESIGNED. Whether he initiated it or some other event brought it to light, he pretty much admitted it for a quick get away.
He said that he went to visit his mother after being at the hospital. He didn't indicate exactly when he left the hospital. It could have been at 7:00 for all we know.
The time interval that matters is from 9:00 PM to 9:30 PM to 10:07 PM, as that is when the murders occurred and were reported. I have not considered, nor mentioned, any time interval except for that time interval.
I do believe that Alex drove his father to the hospital and that he visited his mother prior to discovering the murders around 10 PM.
This does not necessarily exclude Alex as a suspect. It is possible that a suspect could drive from the hospital at 9 PM, to Moselle, to visit his mother, and back to Moselle between 9 PM and 10:07 PM.
View attachment 312498
The timeline is also to be noted for Randy to have made the claim right out the gate for the iron clad alibi. It has to be registered somewhere provable in the case of a trial.
What about MM’s cell phone found on the side of the road? How did it get there? Are we thinking AM hid it when the cops came to the scene of the crime and then threw it out on the side of the road later?
Could be that Margaret's phone was in her hand when she was shot and she dropped it right there, whereas Paul's may not have been visible -- in his pocket, car or the house -- and shooter did not want to look or rummage. Or Paul's appearance was so unexpected that the shooter just hightailed it after Paul was shot. JMO.I'm curious about that too. Did the shooter intend to take both cell phones from the scene? Was there an altercation where Margaret's cell phone was taken from her and tossed to prevent her from using it? Did the shooter look for the phone after the murders, but it was impossible to find in the dark? Did the shooter take the phones and accidentally drop one while getting back in the car after the murders?
In General Terms, Has anyone spoken of the guns , how many, what kind, are registered to the Murdaugh Family ?
Could be that Margaret's phone was in her hand when she was shot and she dropped it right there, whereas Paul's may not have been visible -- in his pocket, car or the house -- and shooter did not want to look or rummage. Or Paul's appearance was so unexpected that the shooter just hightailed it after Paul was shot. JMO.
Good point. Whoever killed MM used a weapon that’s efficient but not personal. Wanted to get it done quickly and get out of there pronto. Didn’t have heart to shoot head/face. MM might have still been barely alive when he left so he didn’t want to risk her “coming to” and calling for help. Took phone then ditched it out the car window ASAP.
Contrast that with a shotgun to the body and face. Either very angry at the known victim OR didn’t know it was him and could’ve been a mistake, but whoever the shooter thought he was shooting at, he really wanted to make sure the person died there for sure.
Personally I think AM resigning and then releasing that statement of shame for what he'd done to people, with "colleagues" included, is an admission of professionsl wrongdoing. It would be a no-brainer that the public reading that would then take it as an admission of guilt of the embezzlement accusation. AJMOIn the situation described in my previous post, AM’s termination was, no doubt, a constructive firing. In professional firms (e.g., law firms, accounting firms, medical practices, etc.), it is often opted, as a professional courtesy (even if not deserved), to allow a person to resign in the face of being otherwise fired. One way, or another (i.e., fired, suspended, or resigned), he was likely going to be walked out of that building after that meeting.
Him resigning in those circumstances does not indicate an admission of guilt or that he wanted to “get out of Dodge” so to speak. I think he had no choice but to “resign.”
All MOO.
I've thought about PM's wounds a lot. A shotgun blast to the chest area and then a second through his arm into his head.Remember both victims were shot at close range, “execution style.” I don’t think identity was in question. MOO
I would be interested to know which side of the road the phone was on. That would tell whether it was the driver or the passenger who threw it.I'm curious about that too. Did the shooter intend to take both cell phones from the scene? Was there an altercation where Margaret's cell phone was taken from her and tossed to prevent her from using it? Did the shooter look for the phone after the murders, but it was impossible to find in the dark? Did the shooter take the phones and accidentally drop one while getting back in the car after the murders?
Ok, good point.Remember both victims were shot at close range, “execution style.” I don’t think identity was in question. MOO