Cindizzi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
- Messages
- 10,852
- Reaction score
- 150,046
Yes, so true. And also if the victim was falling that could also affect the trajectory it seems.I read an interview earlier (no link) stating the angle of that shot can vary based on the position of the victim when they were shot - standing up, falling, etc. IIRC, the shooter was slightly behind them, too.
AmenThe defense has nothing.
They have shown pretty pictures of children-sized beings creeping around.
This non-expert has shown how little he knows about any of this. I suspect all the real experts declined to participate or if they did, their eventual results were’t what the defense wanted to hear.
This drink is on the house, we understand.This is really ticking me off, I'm walking away for the rest of this baloney![]()
Harpootlian should have been reprimanded for that little antic. And there’s nothing funny about any of this.
A sophomoric move by a very seasoned defense professional! If the Murdaugh family is assisting with funding this defense, Randy needs to pounce on this and cut back on JG's fee arrangement. You can bet if the roles were reversed, they'd be screaming MISTRIAL. JMO
Yep here we go!! PM killed his mother and then shot himself
Agreed all these funky bullet and pellet angles which I have thrown over the fence as garbage. The acoustic testing as well for at this point I'm Charlie Brown listening to adult's talk, remember that mumble jumble lol.The defense can talk all they want with this useless witness (nothing against the man, but his testimony doesn't add up). The fact remains that Alex is heard clearly on Paul's cell phone, you can hear Alex talking with Paul and Maggie, just minutes before the time of the murders.... I think we need to talk about that. Among other things....
I wish we could hear about how this witness was found, what they were asked to do, what information they were given before they went to do their assessment, etc. Did the defense say we are looking for someone to say xyz and then the guy went out there to see if he could find a way to say that specific thing. Did they say we want to disprove xyz and then have this guy come up with something? Did he have a totally unbiased look at the scene and come up with this and present it to the defense and then they accept or reject him or ask him to testify based on what he finds. It would be interesting to know. I think the most credible expert would be one that was given the photos of the crime scene and allowed to go to the property and present what he sees/thinks happened without knowing what the defense is trying to prove or disprove.Confirmation bias maybe, more probable is a highly developed BS meter.
I do believe that’s where they are goingWith this sound stuff, are they still trying to say AM was napping when they were killed, instead of down at the kennel with them and heard on the video?
Appalling.
Right!?!? What is wrong with these attorneys and social media?!?!A sophomoric move by a very seasoned defense professional! If the Murdaugh family is assisting with funding this defense, Randy needs to pounce on this and cut back on JG's fee arrangement. You can bet if the roles were reversed, they'd be screaming MISTRIAL. JMO