clearskies1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2014
- Messages
- 3,944
- Reaction score
- 29,642
I wasn't able to listen to a lot of today's testimony. Did the Defense actually make any new points that a reasonable juror might think matter?
AM might find a white-collar prison full of less violent offenders (including drug dealers) to be preferable to his other prison options.Correct me if I'm wrong, but Ellick will serve many years in prison on other charges no matter what happens in this trial -
Yeah, I agree. That story does not make sense. If your father is that ill and that fragile -- remember, he died three days later -- I cannot in a thousand years imagine driving him anywhere in anything but a very reliable, comfortable vehicle. The old farm truck story makes no sense whatsoever.Let me get this straight.
PM is working in Okatie and using the old farm truck rather than his F150 Platinum that is exactly like JMM's. This is because PM's F150 is in the shop.
JMM gets a call from RM4 asking him if he can take RM3 to his doctor's appointment (in Savannah, I believe) as RM3 is having trouble breathing, but RM4 cannot make the entire trip himself as he has time sensitive appointments later in the day.
JMM agrees and they decide to meet halfway, in Ridgeland. RM4 drives RM3 to Ridgeland in RM3's car. JMM chooses to drive to Ridgeland in PM's old farm truck rather than his own pickup (which he leaves in Okatie for PM).
Why would JMM choose to take the old farm truck for this important trip where a breakdown would be a major inconvenience (since a breakdown could delay JMM meeting to pickup RM3 or, if the breakdown occurs after JMM and RM3 continue on in RM3's vehicle could delay RM4 from getting to his time sensitive meetings)?
Why wouldn't JMM take his own F150 and let PM take the farm truck?
The whole “the trees have grown since then” is odd. No one has said that a shooter hid behind trees or that one escaped through a forest of narrow trees or anything other than the dogs running to a treed area to do their business And some fruit trees that were leaning over. A weak attempt on the prosecutor’s side to prevent the trip unless I missed something about the trees.
I assumed it was to explain why Paul wasn’t there in his own truck, which I think Alex initially said Paul was driving? And maybe to subtly show that JMM himself was not there… What a mess.
Ah, ok, thanks! Not much difference in a year and a half, to me, though.The issue with the trees would be sound dampening and ability to see the lights at the kennel and house. If it is seen as secluded, there would be more of a chance of the jury thinking that AM could not hear or see from the house or the road.
Thanks. Not much difference in a year and a half though.There was testimony about hearing the gunshots from the house. I can't remember the witness or I'd post the link for you. That's what the prosecution was talking about.
John Marvin wants you to know that when AM had diarrhea in the car, he didn't have it in a toilet. He had it in his pants.I missed the pants comment today, what was said? tia
No, some boring forensic testimony that I doubt will change anyone's minds' and John Marvin who added absolutely nothing other than telling us a delightful anecdote about Alex Murdaugh pooping his pants and admitting that he knew his brother was lying about not being at the kennels because he recognized Alex's voice on the video. Oh, and that he thought that Mallory Beach's death was blown out of proportion.I wasn't able to listen to a lot of today's testimony. Did the Defense actually make any new points that a reasonable juror might think matter?
Ack! I missed that comment. Unbelievable.I can't believe that John Marvin testified that the boat crash was blown out of proportion. I think that was the most jaw-dropping statements I've heard in the trial, second to "Alex Murdaugh would like to take the stand".
It makes just about much sense as RM4 not having his phone on him for the first of a couple of AM's calls that night - the same night that his father was in the hospital (so you'd assume one would keep a phone handy).Yeah, I agree. That story does not make sense. If your father is that ill and that fragile -- remember, he died three days later -- I cannot in a thousand years driving him anywhere in anything but a very reliable, comfortable vehicle. The old farm truck story makes no sense whatsoever.
Unless, perhaps, it was not pronounced or in play at that time? Rather, might it instead be part of a new narrative?Yeah that sounds like a pile of...malarkey
I think they are relating that to having a visual from the house to the kennels, being able to see lights, what you can hear, what the actual scene is at the kennels. I’m not a lawyer, but I think a lot of these objections they make knowing they will be overruled to be on the record for future legal battles should they arise. Such as the defense asking for a directive verdict to have the case dismissed due to lack of evidence when they rested their case.The whole “the trees have grown since then” is odd. No one has said that a shooter hid behind trees or that one escaped through a forest of narrow trees or anything other than the dogs running to a treed area to do their business And some fruit trees that were leaning over. A weak attempt on the prosecutor’s side to prevent the trip unless I missed something about the trees.
I’m so sorry your family suffered that way.I have a cousin whose 16 year old son shot himself in the head. They brought in a clean up crew to clean up the blood and brain matter, standard OP in SC.
Ah, ok, thanks! Not much difference in a year and a half, to me, though.
If I recall correctly, Alex told them they might have went to the kennels in Paul's truck. Since a truck was missing there was some alert for it and it was found on the side of the road. I think the suggestion being whoever killed them took the truck, but there ended up not being a missing truck. Alex would have known what truck Paul had so he knew there was no missing truck is my thinking.I don’t know, but since the prosecution asked about this truck and the defense (Imo) preemptively brought up the whole topic, there must be something significant about it that the prosecution will cover either in their rebuttal case and/or closing argument. Otherwise, why even mention this farm truck/logistics thing?
And that doesn't even include the envelopes full of money that the younger Tuten brother testified to delivering to Alex when his Police Chief friend was present.question of the day: did you know your "Police Chief Friend" (paraphrasing with friend) was LOANED money by AM? answer: no. note: this was about a month after the murders. Greg Alexander, Yemassee police chief received $5k as a loan for his parents. how nice, other people's money.
I would think that would feel downright homey to him.AM might find a white-collar prison full of less violent offenders (including drug dealers) to be preferable to his other prison options.