Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, not going to open that can of worms and have an investigation focused on himI bet Buster wouldn't dare get into a defamation lawsuit on that.
I AGREE! They have made up their minds on way or anotherI feel bad for the jury. They've been over this again and again and again. Have mercy on them and end this! They've already made up their mind about how this went down in my opinion.
I think the jury will be quick. Seeing Moselle won't change anything. I do think some could have been unsure before Alex took the stand, but once he stepped down I bet most if not all had made up their mind. Once a defendant takes the stand it really does change things. The defense experts didn't make much sense in real time when they explained things. Doesn't take an expert for most to know a shot to the back of the head isn't sending the brain back out the way the bullet entered. I think the rebuttal might have solidified some, but wasn't changing minds because I think minds were already made up.I feel bad for the jury. They've been over this again and again and again. Have mercy on them and end this! They've already made up their mind about how this went down in my opinion.
They may not want to get out of the busSounds like it’s going to be a “Morning in Moselle”, hogs included …
Running out the clock IMOI feel like we’re going over the same thing over and over …. can JG please be done?
Has anyone here ever shot a shotgun? Did you use both arms? Your shoulder?
Did you shoot from the hip?
If you shot twice in rapid fire succession, was your shoulder bruised? Sore?
What about 5 rounds in rapid succession from an AR-15?
I agree. My question is what advantage did they seek in having the shot to Paul’s head in that manner?I think the jury will be quick. Seeing Moselle won't change anything. I do think some could have been unsure before Alex took the stand, but once he stepped down I bet most if not all had made up their mind. Once a defendant takes the stand it really does change things. The defense experts didn't make much sense in real time when they explained things. Doesn't take an expert for most to know a shot to the back of the head isn't sending the brain back out the way the bullet entered. I think the rebuttal might have solidified some, but wasn't changing minds because I think minds were already made up.
Did you hear Mr Kinsey or no? He even knew what the defense was implying.What? They suggested there was a contact wound.
Has anyone here ever shot a shotgun? Did you use both arms? Your shoulder?
Did you shoot from the hip?
If you shot twice in rapid fire succession, was your shoulder bruised? Sore?
What about 5 rounds in rapid succession from an AR-15?
My husband shoots sportings clays with a Blaser over and under, also shoots long distance, used to hunt, kills wild hogs on our place, has an AR15 with thermal and silencer for hog hunting.Has anyone here ever shot a shotgun? Did you use both arms? Your shoulder?
Did you shoot from the hip?
If you shot twice in rapid fire succession, was your shoulder bruised? Sore?
What about 5 rounds in rapid succession from an AR-15?
I bet Buster wouldn't dare get into a defamation lawsuit on that.
Has anyone here ever shot a shotgun? Did you use both arms? Your shoulder?
Did you shoot from the hip?
If you shot twice in rapid fire succession, was your shoulder bruised? Sore?
What about 5 rounds in rapid succession from an AR-15?
I wish I was a fly on the wall in chambers.