I know we just started jury selection, but how does the publicity of this trial so far compare to the Peterson trial? I know that trial was also televised by Court TV/TruTV but what was the national coverage like outside of that channel? Could you avoid it?
(ETA: I was only in 5th/6th grade when that trial was happening, and I remember watching it on TruTV with my mom but I wasn't watching news channels at that age so I couldn't tell you what the coverage was outside of TruTV, which is why I'm asking.)
BBM: Way to make me feel old! LOL!
I would say it is very similar. The technology has advanced in the years since Scott was tried, but there is a common thread of exposure.
Scott v Casey
1) Scott's trial was not aired, but Court TV had a reporter texting near constant updates and THAT was aired. Casey's trial will be aired with near constant twitter updates from those in the courtroom.
2) Pretty much wall to wall coverage on Court TV/Tru TV (In Session)
3) Scott had protestors, radio personalities driving through his neighborhood in a van with a megaphone; Casey had the 24/7 webcam and protestors.
4) Both trials have/had a line for seats for the public.
5) Both trials have the *unique* parents of the defendant and a lawyer who can't stop talking.
6) Both defendants talked themselves into a deep hole, and then stopped talking to anyone (although Casey figured this out sooner than Scott did).
7) Cell phones and pings major evidence against both.
8) Both trials have/had sexual components that draw viewers.
9) Both trials involve the death of an innocent child, which draws viewers.
10) Both trials have a young, white, attractive (to some) defendant who makes you :waitasec: about how it all came to this.
11) Both trials have a defense attorney who makes big promises about revealing "the truth" at trial.
12) You could sign up for text updates from Court TV for the Peterson case; you can download the iPhone app for the Anthony case. Or friend WESH on facebook, or follow about a million reporters on twitter.
More?