Makes a whole lot of sense doesn't it? Yet a school can have a website and put your child's picture up in a group photo or sports photo or online video or whatever. I think this came from one of my remarks--it is a fine line. A parent should be able to see their child sleeping in a crib at a day care, etc., seeing the child held and rocked, etc. I feel with how economically feasible it is nowadays. Should anyone else have access to that? Of course not.
The Chrome Books schools are issuing go home and have cameras activated as well as other garbage installed. Interestingly enough Silicon Valley and some big people send their children to school and do not want them near these things, they want them learning critical thinking skills and pencil driven tasks--but they put them in every other child's world and parent's world and the school world where we cannot even keep up with what our children are exposed to.
I am getting dangerously close to politics and off topic but to go back to topic, I will say that anyone vulnerable should be protected in every way. A child, the elderly, etc. I know that is living in a dream world to think it can happen. Whether a nanny cam, a security system, etc.
Abuse (and theft) has been caught in nursing homes from the adult child of a resident installing a nanny cam in the room.
It is a discussion that definitely has pros and cons. Privacy is something I value and most do. Yet I also want to know anyone vulnerable is protected and that family members can make sure of that.
I do not know what the answer is.
In my lifetime I have known both evil and good teachers, both with myself and others and other generations; good and bad cops, judges, LE; good and bad doctors; good and crooked car salesmen; good and bad servers and I could go on.
We agree ya know
Edited to change wrong word