I see JM is publishing a book - will be out Jan.5, 2016.
From Amazon:
Conviction: The Untold Story of Putting Jodi Arias Behind Bars
by Juan Martinez (Author), Lisa Pulitzer (Author)
Kindle and Hardcover
Makes me wonder if he is planning to retire? If so, I certainly hope it's for another opportunity rather than the AZ Bar complaint(s?).
This article from Phoenix Magazine mentions two attorney groups working together on a "sweeping complaint" :
Confusion, the only reason Juan can't use the "you guys are *advertiser censored**holes" defense is because tainting the juror, contraband & exchange for JA, trashing the victim with heinous *defense (offense), generally frustrating the DA with such abuse of the legal defense profession, accusation of 'remarkable files' supposedly marked for deletion coinciding with the date computer was in DEFENSE' possession, and attacking Dr. DeMarte like a jealous undereducated 'sissy are for some reason, excusable in court.
If JM works relentlessly to discount witnesses who have drug histories, will lie in court due to prior manipulation from 'defendant,' wants to 'skewer' a 'witness' who's not really a witness because she's posing as a well-informed layperson on the subject of undocumented and unverifiable domestic abuse (victim's tires are taken in slashed - twice, breaking and entering occurs, acts of stalking they can't prosecute JA for at this point because she 'defended' :moo: herself from her abuser with knife and* gun, EVERYONE and their dog saw her do these things, etc etc)...then I say, he gets to do that!
Both sides end up sounding 'dramatic,' it's not just him, he wasn't even doing anything for show. It's a natural court retort mechanism and he was probably annoyed that the cameras were even there for a circus show. Lawyers who seem to come up with every inappropriate tactic truly annoy him because they waste his time, the people's time, and the state's/taxpayer's money, for what? For some d-bag? If I were JM.... oh man, this Robert McWhiny guy sounds like another individual who lost a case to someone intelligent, thoroughly competent, able to carry *some* deserving sass because he KNOWS he doesn't have to prove his self-worth to anyone.
I say if you have the passion and the insight to demonstrate to the court just how irritating it is to have to deal with attorneys who want to claim a stake to their OWN names and pull every cat and dog out of a hat to pad their own wallets, then by all means, do it. Don't enter the legal profession if you don't like rebuttals or anyone to question your line of defense. The jury wasn't stupid, (except for the woman who Maria dela Rosa's daughter? facebooked :facepalm:...), if lawyers can be intimidated, so can the jury, it could backfire on JM, but it hasn't*, for good reason. And the JURY wanted this trial DONE WITH already waaay back when as well! It was cat and mouse and it wasn't the DA who put on the show.
You can't waste the DA's time with childish defense* and expect him to roll over like some self-sacrificing saint because that's what alpha heroes do, JM's not a doormat, he's an educated professional, and you got roasted because you had no substance in your case(s) and that's the nature of the job. He didn't want a celebrity' trial. Next time tell your pathological client to keep her annoying face off my television with her 100 interviews!
These lawyers know they're facing someone with credibility and they're misrepresenting a credible professional with someone who has an actual desire for status. They expected to have won the case with dirty tactics (or a "come on, big guy, let us have ONE good day in court, let us THINK we're wining, just a little?", *le sigh*), the DA to be detrimentally accepting in the courtroom, and not have gained any more notoriety than the tactless attorneys who fear ruined reputations.
Professionally/academically, he's not rolling over like a saint for the 'poor, less prestigious, self-pitying attorneys' who resent him for his hard-earned reputation due to EFFICIENT hard work, using his ACTUAL legal/research skills, not playing dirty games and still* making his case and passion known ANYWAY. JM doesn't scare me, if I were a wimp with no class, I might feel threatened by him. But fair is fair, sometimes, you have to take your lumps and realize you've been beaten and not have a cow about it! Use it as a learning experience, not start some vengeful/spiteful vendetta against 'your enemy.' That just makes these attorneys seem JUST like they're clients!