Cherokee
Well-Known Member
You're right. I stated my claim as fact that you presumed SBTC is religious.
You are absolutely and totally wrong!
I NEVER stated that I presumed SBTC to be religious. Nowhere did I state that or claim that or whatever YOU want to call it. Find my post where I said that. Go ahead and try. You'll spend the rest of your life because I never said ANYTHING about SBTC being religious.
What I did address was your statement that the word "Victory!" had no religious connotation. I proved that it DID have religious connotations, but you have conveniently ignored that post because it proved you wrong. You have not said one word about it.
Furthermore, I didn't even state that Patsy used "Victory" as a religious reference. All I did was prove it COULD have been a religious reference. Once again, I never said one thing about SBTC having religious connotations. You are trying to put words in my mouth. Typical IDI trait.
Do you know how many times SBTC has been presumed without a single basis for it? I'll tell you this, I have NEVER stated whate I thought it meant. Not because I have no ideas, but because there's nothing to support any of them. Sure I could throw stuff out, but without any support it would amount to idle speculation.
And I never presumed what SBTC meant either. I never said that, nor have I said that in all my years of posting. I do not know what the initials mean, if anything. I do know the ransom note writer felt they had to come up with something that "sounded like" the terrorist group they were supposed to represent. It is my opinion that Patsy wrote the ransom note, therefore, she would have been the one who created the initials.
I also discussed the absolute non-necessity of any terrorist organization (or crazed intruder) to provide an indented closing to their ransom note. I tried to get you to look at a comparison of Patsy's closings to the ransom note, but you refuse. Why?
Here is the link again:
http://www.forumsforjustice.org/foru...ead.php?t=6404
What are you afraid of? Why do you refuse to even look at a comparison?
I'm moving on now.
Of course you're "moving on." You have no answers to my questions and no rebuttals to my arguments. You will not admit that you were wrong about "Victory," and you are afraid to look at evidence that might change your presumptions and preconceived notions. You accuse others of saying things they did not say, and then try to "move on" when you are caught out.
Stay and defend your word and actions. Be a different kind of IDI - one that backs up their theory with facts and documented evidence. Don't cut and run like the other IDIs when they are faced with incontrovertible proof of the Ramsey's culpability.