truthspider
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2011
- Messages
- 1,322
- Reaction score
- 28
tkm's posts have no effect on the statements I made today.
tkm's posts have no effect on the statements I made today.
Whoa! Mr. B,
It is quite possible Truth IS privy to some inside info, without knowing MG and/or without being a member to some secret websleuth subclan. No?
I agree with all who say, "if it is going to hurt the investigation, keep it off the board" but I also think that the advocates for justice have the extreme challenge of walking that fine line (or tightrope? - if anyone can screw up the english language, it's me, and it is my native tongue.)
It's quite impossible to be a member of any kind of circle claiming to get DIRECTLY information from someone without knowing it. And since someone else made that claim in Truthspider's name, the question is, did Truthspider even know about that claim. In other words, it's about giving Truthspider opportunity to distance himself from the claim Mocking Bird made or lose his credibility due to something Mocking Bird did. Which then would also influence the credibility from any further information coming from him. So, it's not about Truthspider having access to local rumors. He hangs out so much in OB, that it's a miracle, he didn't get a house there. It would make me wonder if he hasn't the one or other rumor and doesn't talk about it. But the claim to be in direct contact with Mari Gilbert and getting insider information from there, as Mocking Bird made in his name, that's an entirely different story. So please, don't try to distract from the subject.
Peter
Uhhhhh... I really thought TS answered this in post #1214.
So Mocking Bird's claim, you, Jennie9 and Mocking Bird are privy to confidential inside information directly from Mari Gilbert is, as far as you are concerned, a blatant lie and you know nothing about such inside information? Interesting ...
Peter
i've been hearing that those items were in good condition as well.....
hopefully we get real confirmation soon.
Mr. B,
To me, Mockingbird's post sounded like she was ASSUMING how Truthspider obtained his info. Truth never has been shy about making it known he knows more of what has been going on behind the scenes. Just like your post to me sounded like you were assuming I was intentionally trying to distract you. Which I wasn't. You came off very accusatory and aggressive in your post to Truth (not that he can't handle it. that man can spar with the best of em) but it just seemed overly aggressive to me, and I still cannot understand why. Maybe I just missed something, so I will reread the thread.
peter what we were discussing on an earlier thread is what could have been paper id,i never insinuated that i knew anything,so really back off
On this topic of new info: For six months, it has been publicized (MSM) that LE found SG's purse. It cannot jeopardize the "investigation" to assume that their was paper in her purse and that there was indeed some item/items that pointed to the purse belonging to SG.
To surmise that those items would have been weather beaten if they had been lying there for nearly 18 months is only logical. If any member here saw any paper item, in good or excellent condition, then it is worth discussing the merits of such evidence. Anything, in SG's jeans, jacket, or purse that was not weather beaten is EXTREMELY important to the theory that she and/or her belongings were not in the brambles, off of Anchor way and behind the homes on Larbord (sp?), for the length of time that she was missing.
i'm real.
Mr. B,
To me, Mockingbird's post sounded like she was
i'm real.
---------------TKM wrote in post #1164:
and yes, I am in permanent contact with the family. I will tell you, as Jenny9 will tell you
and Truth spider will tell you - Mr. Brendt - there is information that the public has not found out
(yet) and if you had this information...you'd be singing a different tune....
So it was TKM who made the claim in the name of Jenny9 and Truthspider. All I want to know is, do Jenny9 and Truthspider support TKM's claim they aredefinitely part of a circle getting inside information directly from MG as TKM's post #1164 indicates. Or are they denying it. I just want a clear simple statement about that. No wriggling around, just a clear answer.
Peter