Spyglass
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2008
- Messages
- 536
- Reaction score
- 65
This is such a complicated case with so many black holes: ZFG, paternity, degraded evidence, perp alternately lying and silent, changing statements by the family...
I think the priority of the SA's office should be to prosecute the murderer. That is number one and that is where the focus should remain.
If prosecuting witnesses for perjury/obstruction/etc is necessary or helpful in the murder trial, only then should those charges be pursued prior to the murder trial.
If not necessary or helpful in the murder trial, perjury/obstruction/etc should be addressed after the murder trial.
Two questions: What is the time limit for filing perjury/obstruction/etc charges?
Does anyone see any possibility of Federal charges based on the family's interviews with FBI?
I think the priority of the SA's office should be to prosecute the murderer. That is number one and that is where the focus should remain.
If prosecuting witnesses for perjury/obstruction/etc is necessary or helpful in the murder trial, only then should those charges be pursued prior to the murder trial.
If not necessary or helpful in the murder trial, perjury/obstruction/etc should be addressed after the murder trial.
Two questions: What is the time limit for filing perjury/obstruction/etc charges?
Does anyone see any possibility of Federal charges based on the family's interviews with FBI?