sloane7777
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2009
- Messages
- 4,652
- Reaction score
- 12,728
Beyond a reasonable doubt!!!!! I dont know about ya'll but I have ALOT of doubt! there were too many trial errors, jury did not hear all ....just too much doubt
Beyond a reasonable doubt!!!!! I dont know about ya'll but I have ALOT of doubt! there were too many trial errors, jury did not hear all ....just too much doubt
Don't watch tv programs or read books about this case. Read the trials transcripts, they are the only true source of this case. You have the false impression from some tv show or book that the jury did not see all the evidence, photos of bruises, etc., but if you read the transcripts you will see that they were entered into evidence and the jury did see them.
yeah, i pretty sure she is innocent.....some sicko did this....some people dont need a reason to kill....look at tommy lynn sells he murdered many children and one mum went to jail for stabbing and murdering her little boy and she finally was released when tommy lynn sells confessedShould Darlie Routier be given a new trial?
yeah, i pretty sure she is innocent.....some sicko did this....some people dont need a reason to kill....look at tommy lynn sells he murdered many children and one mum went to jail for stabbing and murdering her little boy and she finally was released when tommy lynn sells confessed
yeah, i pretty sure she is innocent.....some sicko did this....some people dont need a reason to kill....look at tommy lynn sells he murdered many children and one mum went to jail for stabbing and murdering her little boy and she finally was released when tommy lynn sells confessed
yeah, i pretty sure she is innocent.....some sicko did this....some people don't need a reason to kill....look at tommy lynn sells he murdered many children and one mum went to jail for stabbing and murdering her little boy and she finally was released when tommy lynn sells confessed
Darlie was convicted on the evidence, not the transcripts, as the transcripts were not produced until after the trial. Here's a link to Susan Simmons affidavit about Halsey's work: http://www.fordarlieroutier.org/Evidence/WritAffidavits/simmons.html
This is an interesting read for both sides.
Charlie Samford is the only juror to say that he would not have voted for conviction if he had 'seen all them pictures.' However, even Doug Mulder admits that all the photographs were entered into evidence.
yeah, i pretty sure she is innocent.....some sicko did this....some people dont need a reason to kill....look at tommy lynn sells he murdered many children and one mum went to jail for stabbing and murdering her little boy and she finally was released when tommy lynn sells confessed
Hey Mary, missed ya, welcome back!!
:blowkissarlie was convicted on the evidence that was presented to the jury, several jurors have stated, they would not convicted her had they known everything they know now!I'm just saying.....
Several jurors? which ones? do you have a link with proof that several jurors have stated they would not have convicted her.
That's a complete fallacy started by supporters of Darlie's. One juror has stated he did not see the bruises. Trial evidence proves the photos were shown and discussed at trial.