Respectfully, I disagree. I think TA did google *advertiser censored* and watched it for several reasons. By all accounts, IMO TA was still rather inexperienced sexually. Most guys his age had been having sex since they were in high school. He gets involved with CMJA who has been having sex since she was a teen and was far more experienced. This would tap into any guy's insecurities about being good in bed. What better way to "catch up on moves" than to watch *advertiser censored*. F
From the dates BN mentioned, the *advertiser censored* seemed to start when he had met and had become involved with CMJA. She was a sexual dynamo from the sounds of it and she used her sexuality to attract and manipulate men. We all know the type as we have witnessed it in action more than likely. IMO, the *advertiser censored* was perfectly normal. TA was by all accounts a great guy, but he was not a saint. JMO
And I respectfully disagree. I don't think Travis Googled *advertiser censored*. missy:jail: did it when she was on his computer (and it seemed she was on his computer a lot- she knew his password) and thus all the computer *advertiser censored*/viruses. Travis was not an inexperienced lover as he had sex with Deanna. Just because Travis had only one lover, doesn't mean he didn't know what he was doing in bed, IMO. I'm sure they explored , together, different ways to fulfill their love for each other- people normally do in long-term relationships. To me, it's just a natural progression in the education of partners likes/dislikes and what feels good to them. Sure, missy was more experienced, as she had a lot of partners, and she taught Travis more, but I don't see this as Travis having to be insecure about his experience or that he wasn't a good lover (especially if missy was saying that he was a great lover).
I do think that men have to have a certain "mindset" to look at *advertiser censored* and if they don't have that "mindset", they won't look at it. My father didn't look at *advertiser censored*, although he was from a different generation (but there was *advertiser censored* around in the form of magazines, "girly" pics, and X-rated movies in those slimy theaters) because he had his values. I think my father would have died of shame to even look at that degrading - to him- stuff. So, too, Travis, who did value his religion and all that it stands for and his own good values, wouldn't degrade himself, IMO.
These days , it's different, as it has become a disease in our society, and people see it as "normal" , but it's not normal, IMO, just because more people are plastering it on the internet- a wider venue than they have had in previous generations. What I saw on Twitter the other day just disgusted me- people defecating on another person is not "normal" to me and I think many people would say the same. Why there was even a child looking at a woman, at what seems, a party with a cake that had a man's private part, how can I put this delicately? well I can't.
Anyway, *advertiser censored* is a disease- it makes men think that what they are watching online, is what is normal, what should be in lovemaking, but what they are watching is scripted garbage, with men and women who are "edited" in every way, especially their looks. I would think that these men who look at *advertiser censored* would be even more insecure in their lovemaking when they look at the machismo, herculean "delights" such as these men/women show. Never mind what a woman must feel when they look at *advertiser censored*- maybe comparing herself to air-brushed, surgically-enhanced women whom pornographers portrayed as compliant sex partners with endless cravings for hot sex. (Let me just add a PFtt to that)
I know I'm an old woman and my mindset may be different from the younger generation, but I'm not a prude in any sense of the word. Sex is a wonderful thing and, to me, it's sacred and personal. The human body is a work of art, if I may say that- beautiful in every way, but when *advertiser censored* is a part of it, it becomes dirty and disgusting, IMO. I think that many people feel the same way that I do and IMO, Travis (and Deanna) felt the same way because they had values. You don't have to be a saint to have values, IMO. It's missy:jail: that brought the disease of *advertiser censored* to Travis' computer and that's what caused Travis to become very angry at missy:jail:, IMO.
All :moo: of course, as I do respect everyone opinions- just thought I'd give mine on this subject.