ElleElle
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2013
- Messages
- 7,497
- Reaction score
- 33
Fair enough. I just find it odd he was having a hard time finding a wife at his age.
Google Arizona news ABC
It worked!![]()
Heck, my son is 30 and unmarried. He's NOT looking just yet. Fine by me!I don't normally talk about my personal affairs but I don't understand your statement. I didn't get married until I was 32. (Got divorced 8 yrs later but that's beside the point) I had no idea I married a con artist![]()
Here is the Jury- just scroll down on the right to the correct video - it's under 'Most Popular'
http://www.azcentral.com/12news/#videoplayer
Is it over?
Personally, I think she is entirely too lazy to try to escape. It's easier for her to manipulate others to actually work and perform tasks.
I just checked the 12 news channel and there is no live feed. They said they would post a link as soon as it is on the web.
the verbal and emotional abuse were indisputable. It was there in black and white in emails, text messages, and recorded conversations....we heard and read the ups and downs of the toxic relationship.
I thought that what the foreman had to say was sensible.....he like you didn't buy that it wasn't premeditated. He saw the epic pain of the family and the tragic killing of a young man.....but he also was able to acknowledge that she was emotionally abused. That isn't an excuse, but it is a factor to consider in the sentencing phase IMO. All of the sum and substance of the prior jury decisions would have been served with a Life Sentence without possibility of parole.
MOO
BBM
I think she treated him like an object - an object to give her kids, a house, and family life. She didn't care what was inside his soul. It's exactly like his said - dildo with a heartbeat. Except she didn't really want him for the sex, the sex was just a means to her end...the end being the house, kids, and family life, oh and money too. And the fake-attention to him was also the means to this end. Everything was fake. Everything was for her one goal: to fulfill the image she had in her imagination of what she wanted her life to be like.
He did not treat her like an object, IMO. He did not fake his feelings for her, whether in good times or bad. He did not lavish her with fake attention. He was real with her. When he talked to her on the phone, he was real. When he let her borrow his car, he was real. When he let her enter his house whenver she wanted and make herself at home in HIS house, he was real. When he went on trips with her, he was real. When he listened to her never-ending drama on the phone, he was real and his listening and attentivenes were real. When he offered her advice, it was real. WHen he loaned her money, it was for a real purpose to help her. When he let her come into his life and introduced her to his friends, it was real.
I feel strongly, very strongly, that Travis cared for JA on a very human level. I firmly firmly believe that if they had stopped having a sexual relationship, he would have stayed friends with her and helped her and cared about her. Genuine care, not fake like CMJA's "care."
No, they did not treat each other as objects. The objectification was only one-way...from CMJA to Travis.
It looks like Juan should be looking for female jurors, his next go 'round. I always knew we were the smarter sex.:rockon:
Is it over?
It looks like Juan should be looking for female jurors, his next go 'round. I always knew we were the smarter sex.:rockon:
I wonder how the jurors decided on the foreman? They couldn't really base it on opinions about the trial. I guess it would have to be based on personal preference from just being around each other during lunch and breaks. I do believe the jury foreman is fairly well known in the Phoenix area so maybe that is why he was picked.
Not saying that alot of men dont see right through her, but sometimes women see thru other women much quicker than men do jmo