Maybe this has been brought up before, but IMHO, I kind of wish the family would accept life. I know that JA DESERVES death, but my biggest concern is all the appeals that are automatic when you are sentenced to death.
What if JA is sentenced to death, and gets an appellate judge who believes there was some kind of legal error in the trial and orders a retrial. In a retrial, JA can use a different strategy (and now that jury is talking, she knows what the best areas to focus), and might play up the BPD next time. There's no guarantee that in a retrial, she'll get another jury to agree to premeditated first degree murder.
IMHO, life in prison beats rolling the dice on a possible new trial outcome. With as many times as Nurmi filed to get off the case over the past 5 years, I can't believe that wouldn't weigh heavy in the mind of an appellate judge as "ineffective counsel". :stormingmad:
What if JA is sentenced to death, and gets an appellate judge who believes there was some kind of legal error in the trial and orders a retrial. In a retrial, JA can use a different strategy (and now that jury is talking, she knows what the best areas to focus), and might play up the BPD next time. There's no guarantee that in a retrial, she'll get another jury to agree to premeditated first degree murder.
IMHO, life in prison beats rolling the dice on a possible new trial outcome. With as many times as Nurmi filed to get off the case over the past 5 years, I can't believe that wouldn't weigh heavy in the mind of an appellate judge as "ineffective counsel". :stormingmad: