Rewatching the Jodi first interview she gave way back after the arrest. Wearing the jailhouse stripes and all. Then they showed the official Flores investigation tape with the intruder story.
Listen to the intruder story. It's what Jodi would have seen in the mirror while stabbing him. She completely removed herself from the story by referring to "them", "they", "the girl", etc.
If I haven't said it already, I want to say that the Jury Foreman talked out of both sides of his mouth when he proclaimed that the jurors were "mere mortals" and how they were not attorneys and able to say whether or not someone deserved death. Then, he says, "she wasn't like Charlie Manson or Jeffrey Dahmer" (or something to that affect). In other words, IMO, he only feels death row is reserved for those that make multiple killings like Geraldo & Co. thinks. Just my opinion of course.
I believe one has to forgive the person who has caused you harm, not for them, but for yourself so you do not have to live with anger. I can't even imagine how the Alexander family can ever forgive Jodi for the incomprehensible pain that she has caused them to endure.[/QUOTE]
bbm
IMO, Juan needs to show the next jury that CMJA will do WHATEVER it takes to makes their lives miserable. That includes: giving media interviews to shove in their faces, putting up twitter account through friend, cooking up new ideas in jail about how to smear Travis' name, dragging their family name through the mud....etc., etc.. Tell the new jury: Does THIS sound like someone who is sorry for the family and what she's done for the family? Does THIS sound like someone who had a "moment of silence" with her mom in jail for the family? NOOOOOOO.....whenever she says she is sorry for what she's done to the family, it's a LIE.
Also, when CMJA tells jury about how she will "contribute" in prison, Juan needs to tell them, no, she is going to continue obsessing about how to hurt this family. She is not going to do anything in prison except cook up stories to hurt them. Tell the jury about her manipulation and her lack of remorse, and her willingness to do everything to smear the family. A person with a personality like hers, whether it's because of BPD or whatever it doesn't matter what it's because of, the point is her personality is not gonna let her stop obsessing. So she is not going to be able to contribute anything. Just like her obsession with guys made her unable to contribute much to society outside of jail. MOO
I think if he shows the jury exactly how far she is willing to go to hurt the family, it will make it easier for the jury to vote for death. Because it's not fair to the family, first they have to deal with losing Travis in such a horrific way, and now for the rest of their lives they have to deal with CMJA in one way or another? that's not fair to them. I think this will make a BIG impact on the jury. It will negate a lot of the defene's mitigating factors.
Anybody here know why Tara Kelley's (Jury Alternate #17) twitter account is down?
https://twitter.com/tarakelley320
Can someone please tell me how to post a video from tube ? Thanks
I believe one has to forgive the person who has caused you harm, not for them, but for yourself so you do not have to live with anger. I can't even imagine how the Alexander family can ever forgive Jodi for the incomprehensible pain that she has caused them to endure.[/QUOTE]
bbm
IMO, Juan needs to show the next jury that CMJA will do WHATEVER it takes to makes their lives miserable. That includes: giving media interviews to shove in their faces, putting up twitter account through friend, cooking up new ideas in jail about how to smear Travis' name, dragging their family name through the mud....etc., etc.. Tell the new jury: Does THIS sound like someone who is sorry for the family and what she's done for the family? Does THIS sound like someone who had a "moment of silence" with her mom in jail for the family? NOOOOOOO.....whenever she says she is sorry for what she's done to the family, it's a LIE.
Also, when CMJA tells jury about how she will "contribute" in prison, Juan needs to tell them, no, she is going to continue obsessing about how to hurt this family. She is not going to do anything in prison except cook up stories to hurt them. Tell the jury about her manipulation and her lack of remorse, and her willingness to do everything to smear the family. A person with a personality like hers, whether it's because of BPD or whatever it doesn't matter what it's because of, the point is her personality is not gonna let her stop obsessing. So she is not going to be able to contribute anything. Just like her obsession with guys made her unable to contribute much to society outside of jail. MOO
I think if he shows the jury exactly how far she is willing to go to hurt the family, it will make it easier for the jury to vote for death. Because it's not fair to the family, first they have to deal with losing Travis in such a horrific way, and now for the rest of their lives they have to deal with CMJA in one way or another? that's not fair to them. I think this will make a BIG impact on the jury. It will negate a lot of the defene's mitigating factors.
Thank you so much - I was hoping someone could tell us what can Juan bring out or talk about in the next phase that maybe he wasn't allowed to before.
If I haven't said it already, I want to say that the Jury Foreman talked out of both sides of his mouth when he proclaimed that the jurors were "mere mortals" and how they were not attorneys and able to say whether or not someone deserved death. Then, he says, "she wasn't like Charlie Manson or Jeffrey Dahmer" (or something to that affect). In other words, IMO, he only feels death row is reserved for those that make multiple killings like Geraldo & Co. thinks. Just my opinion of course.
Whiskers Hillcrest ... Not very erotic
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
odd and I was following her .....I think she is to do an interview with Wildabouttrial tomorrow also....maybe Dr. Drew did not want her answering more questions prior to being on his show tomorrow,lol.
Yes, when she describes what Travis is going through in her ninja story it describes how much he was suffering, and yes, she removes herself from being the brutal killer she knows she is.
Did you catch that part where she mentions a book about our realities. I want to catch that part again. The part about REALITY when Detective Flores says, "Well, this is reality, you're going to be charged with murder."
I agree, he has some serious issues. After seeing and hearing what he did for nearly five months and now to hear the comments he is making is shocking (imho)
The exact things you have pointed out are the things that make my blood boil about Mr. Jury Foreman. The other jurors that have spoken out so far have made it clear they were speaking for themselves only. But not him----he claimed the "jurors were mere mortals and could not decide if someone deserved death". Baloney on that---he knows darn well 8 of the jurors were able to decide she deseved death. He should have made it clear he was just speaking for himself because that's what he was in fact doing.
Secondly, he should have been focusing on THIS trial and the penalty phase and not be concerning himself with Charlie Manson or Jeffrey Dahmer. No where in the jury instructions did it say he was suppose to compare this case to others to see what he thought would be a fair punishment.
Smoked brisket and chickens, potato salad, dirty rice, fried green tomatoes
Sweet Tea, Shiner Beer
Dessert is Blue Bell (MoolineumCrunch)
The exact things you have pointed out are the things that make my blood boil about Mr. Jury Foreman. The other jurors that have spoken out so far have made it clear they were speaking for themselves only. But not him----he claimed the "jurors were mere mortals and could not decide if someone deserved death". Baloney on that---he knows darn well 8 of the jurors were able to decide she deseved death. He should have made it clear he was just speaking for himself because that's what he was in fact doing.
Secondly, he should have been focusing on THIS trial and the penalty phase and not be concerning himself with Charlie Manson or Jeffrey Dahmer. No where in the jury instructions did it say he was suppose to compare this case to others to see what he thought would be a fair punishment.