Jersey*Girl
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2008
- Messages
- 10,266
- Reaction score
- 152
They have the records from HE's cell (via the cell provider) as well as the records (and maybe even the phones themselves) from the M's.
Could there have been communication through smoke signals and carrier pigeons? Well sure, I guess so.
However, this is what Elders asserted, in court, to the judge. Why not just believe it and take it at face value until or unless something different is shown? The amount of second and third guessing of the Solicitor is curious to me. I can't understand the doubt at every turn.
Rbbm
[modsnip]
With all due respect, you don't have to understand why others would second guess something. This is a murder charge. That's about as serious as serious gets. There will be second guessing all over the case to prove the evidence and the charges. I personally don't second guess the charges with what's given so far. I'm interested in what's going to stick per se. What I'm interested in is the rest of the data evidence that supports the charges bc IMO all social media will play a part in this trial & IMO there's a chance either one or both may not get lwop but rather be sentenced to a certain amount of years.
With regards to the cellphone, just bc T-mobile gave le the calls and texts doesn't mean they were able to obtain everything. When certain apps are used, sometimes they have their own data network that overwrites after so much time and each in-app chat text too. There's even a chance T-mobile might not see previously deleted apps. There's also a chance that not all internet use on that cell would be able to be pulled bc of it being overwritten. Now if they had the physical cell, that's another story, but even then not everything is always able to be pulled. Most of it could though.
I'm curious why you seem to have a problem with anybody and everybody that questions things. I personally think they're guilty. Based on the little bit that's been shown, that's indeed what I think. However, that opinion is subject to change once trial starts and more evidence is tried. I can't speak for anyone else but that's most certainly why I question things. I'll continue to do so, too.
Right now IMVHO Tammy looks horrible as to being the perp. Sidney is made out to look like some stupid spineless puppy dog doing and going along with whatever she says. Maybe that's his shtick. Maybe he's the one that's actually pulling the strings. Afterall, he seems to say nothing at all and he's [modsnip] that caused all of this with regards to his family's demise now. [modsnip]