Holdontoyourhat
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2005
- Messages
- 5,299
- Reaction score
- 12
That would be me.
Patsy wrote the note.
I'm OK with you believing that as long as you're not in LE.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would be me.
Patsy wrote the note.
What about people who are?
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/talkforensics/2009/09/13/cina-wong-forensic-document-examiner
EVERYONE should take a listen.
It's a total b*****k. I can't get that
Any highlights in summary form would be welcome.
Only one thing has changed since this article was released, which hardly renders it obsolete.This article might have well been printed alongside Elvis on Mars.
Now with touch DNA evidence the DNA remarks from this article are exposed as incorrect and presumptuous.
The days of RDI as tabloid faire are gone forever and RDI knows it. Why bother posting obsolete material? Just to further the hype? As if to deliberately mislead the public? There is new information that renders this article somewhere between tabloid hype and obsolete.
Only one thing has changed since this article was released which hardly renders it obsolete.
The touch DNA is the only thing that is new, and you'll excuse me if I'm not impressed.
If we were to abandon every case based on unidentified DNA from skin cells, then, for a start, I guess we may as well release Casey Anthony from prison, because the SFF has apparently come out from hiding and struck again.
You know why Casey Anthony is not being released from prison?
I think I'll tell you - it's because these prosecutors believe in the strength of all of the rest of the evidence which clearly points to guilt. That means that there is an innocent explanation for this unidentified (intruder?) DNA.
Additionally, these prosecutors are not afraid of a trial, and the reason for that is, because unlike their pathetic counterparts in Boulder, they don't just plea bargain every case away and actually have confidence in their courtroom skills.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmBoNzsRp0s
What about people who are?
Only one thing has changed since this article was released, which hardly renders it obsolete.
The touch DNA is the only thing that is new, and you'll excuse me if I'm not impressed.
If we were to abandon every case because unidentified DNA from skin cells (touch DNA) was found, then, for a start, we may as well release Casey Anthony from prison, because the SFF has apparently come out from hiding and struck again.
Do you know why Casey Anthony is not being released from prison?
I'll tell you - it's because these prosecutors believe in the strength of all of the rest of the evidence which clearly points to guilt. That means that there is an innocent explanation for this unidentified (intruder?) DNA.
Additionally, these prosecutors are not afraid of a trial, and the reason for that is, because unlike their pathetic, cowardly counterparts in Boulder, they don't just plea bargain every case away and actually have confidence in their courtroom skills.
No reason it shouldn't work.
She talks extensively about her work on this case: how she found 240+ similarities, how PR had different handwriting styles (four), how Lin Wood threatened her in an attempt to scare her off, how she noticed strange cars following her, how chemicals can alter a person's writing, etc.
Only one thing has changed since this article was released, which hardly renders it obsolete.
The touch DNA is the only thing that is new, and you'll excuse me if I'm not impressed.
If we were to abandon every case because unidentified DNA from skin cells (touch DNA) was found, then, for a start, we may as well release Casey Anthony from prison, because the SFF has apparently come out from hiding and struck again.
Do you know why Casey Anthony is not being released from prison?
I'll tell you - it's because these prosecutors believe in the strength of all of the rest of the evidence which clearly points to guilt. That means that there is an innocent explanation for this unidentified (intruder?) DNA.
Additionally, these prosecutors are not afraid of a trial, and the reason for that is, because unlike their pathetic, cowardly counterparts in Boulder, they don't just plea bargain every case away and actually have confidence in their courtroom skills.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmBoNzsRp0s
ETA: This whole thread is incredible. There is some astonishing stuff on here. LE (and Mary Lacy in particular) should feel humbled.
Even the Ramsey's lawyers thought RDI and were prepared,oh I wonder why,they didn't seem the kind of lawyers who would be afriad of LE conspiracies eh?They KNEW but I guess the Ramsey's were just....lucky.
http://millsproductions.co.uk/jonbenet-ramsey/resources/script4_eviltwist.doc
JOHN RAMSEY V/O
We clearly expected to be arrested
Our attorneys told us that we would be put in a cell and quite likely, there would be someone else in the cell with us. And that we should be very cautious of that person, that quite likely it was an informant. And there were very concerned about an informant sating that we had confessed to them. So we were told we mustnt say a word to anyone
![]()
![]()
Additionally, these prosecutors are not afraid of a trial, and the reason for that is, because unlike their pathetic, cowardly counterparts in Boulder, they don't just plea bargain every case away and actually have confidence in their courtroom skills.
You're F-I-R-E-D
Even the Ramsey's lawyers thought RDI and were prepared,oh I wonder why,they didn't seem the kind of lawyers who would be afriad of LE conspiracies eh?They KNEW but I guess the Ramsey's were just....lucky.
JOHN RAMSEY V/O
Our attorneys told us that we would be put in a cell and quite likely, there would be someone else in the cell with us. And that we should be very cautious of that person, that quite likely it was an informant.