BBM.
I continue to consider the authorities have facts of which we must remain unaware, hence the media silence.
Source – The Guardian Dec. 20. Quote from LBT chief executive Matthew Searle:
...
Dingley was, says Searle,
close to her mother Ria. “
Esther had a fantastic relationship with her mother, they were always in contact,” he said. Last Monday, Ria described her daughter as an “open book” who discussed her travel plans and life decisions.
In re-reading all I can find on ED’s disappearance, I noticed Searle spoke of Esther using the past tense, as has DC.
Perhaps Searle stating ED "
had a fantastic relationship with her mother, they were always in contact” can simply mean he used the past tense ‘had’ because it immediately precedes the phrase ‘they were always in close contact’, and now they are not. It’s the earlier use of the past tense "Dingley
was close to her mother" that strikes me as odd. Why would ED's mere disappearance preclude a close relationship with her mother?
IMO, “Dingley was close to her mother” suggests Searle has information unknown to us.