PeggyHenry
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
- Messages
- 421
- Reaction score
- 2,495
That’s certainly a possible perspective patCee
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
<snipped for focus and BBM>
Dan is suffering. What a nightmare for him. It’s hard to post anything after reading that.
I'm glad to see Dan is fighting back against rumours and the bbc have picked it up.
8 days 12/13th Nov before according to DCs dossier when she stayed overnight with Laura at the refuge. Not sure when/how she told DC when she would be returning and was a question I asked upthread. No one answered so I assume nobody knows.At what point did Esther tell Dan the date she was returning home?
Is it even alluded to in any of her postings or messages that she would be seeing him soon?
I can understand a language misunderstanding that she wasn't sure when rather than if they were going to get back together "Esther said she and Dan were taking a break and she didn’t know if they were going to get back together, but wasn't this conversation rather close to the return date to still be unsure?
I don't have a date for the conversation but somewhere in the back of my mind I'm thinking it was the week prior?
Just a quick pondering - if ED and DC were separated, why do you think DC hasn't said this? Because it makes no difference, and would indeed fill in some blanks.
Looking at their blog for the first time. Immediate impression: this was their business rather than a lifestyle - or rather, a lifestyle that became a business. It's all very carefully managed. The dogs, for example, clearly serve an important PR function, as did ED's charity cycle that immediately got her into the papers. They seem to court publicity however they can and I suspect that DC manages all that side of the business. That is obviously going to take a good deal of drive and therefore some stress - especially with regard to how long they can keep it up. (Personally, I don't know how they do it. I like Alpine hiking as much as anyone, but a 3-day/2-night camping trek seems like quite enough. After that it gets repetitive and frankly boring.)
I don't know if the November trip was to 'keep up the business' or for ED to take some personal time to think about things. Both motives may have psychological consequences.
Keeping up the business also relies on the strength of their relationship. If there were problems with that, as suggested, then the BBC feature might have provided additional pressure, by 'locking her in' in just at a time when she might have been getting fed up of being managed by DC.
As to the disappearance, there are a hundred possible scenarios and it all comes down to probabilities based on intuition seeing as there is no solid evidence for anything. The key indicator, for me, is the bizarre double ascent of Sauvegarde. It's hard to imagine why anyone would climb the same mountain twice on successive days when the reasons for climbing a mountain are a) achievement, b) the view (if you're lucky) - both of which she satisfied the previous day. Maybe it's a good spot for lammergeiers, but as far as I know she's not a birdwatcher. And I can't believe she arranged to meet someone at the top. For one thing, they would be visible to each other as they hiked up. She must have had some personal motive for going up again.
I'd like to get away from the suicide theory but more and more things seems to be pointing towards it.
Thanks Liz...
Apologizing again, as I didn't realize there had been an...explanation.
Search for Esther Dingley: Spanish police say it's 'impossible' and all but give up | Daily Mail Online
<modsnip>
The key indicator, for me, is the bizarre double ascent of Sauvegarde.
I agree with your points about DCs view of EDs disappearance, and believe he is capable of considering the terrain dispassionately, but........I still think she’s in one of the lakes but I’m open minded with what happened but I take DC’s opinion of what he thinks must have happened on board. He knows her best and has been at the location and watched the search. Third party involvement is still a real possibility, lone female hikers have been targeted before.
Looking at their blog for the first time. Immediate impression: this was their business rather than a lifestyle - or rather, a lifestyle that became a business. It's all very carefully managed. The dogs, for example, clearly serve an important PR function, as did ED's charity cycle that immediately got her into the papers. They seem to court publicity however they can and I suspect that DC manages all that side of the business. That is obviously going to take a good deal of drive and therefore some stress - especially with regard to how long they can keep it up. (Personally, I don't know how they do it. I like Alpine hiking as much as anyone, but a 3-day/2-night camping trek seems like quite enough. After that it gets repetitive and frankly boring.)
I don't know if the November trip was to 'keep up the business' or for ED to take some personal time to think about things. Both motives may have psychological consequences.
Keeping up the business also relies on the strength of their relationship. If there were problems with that, as suggested, then the BBC feature might have provided additional pressure, by 'locking her in' in just at a time when she might have been getting fed up of being managed by DC.
The dossier suggests she climbed twice because it wasn’t about "peak bagging" although I’m inclined to think it was because it was the only place she was sure there was phone signal. She would have been unaware at the time that there was good signal on the descent into France. I agree though it does seem strange.
I'd never been to Egea or up to Trubon before but after being shown it by some locals on Sunday, I found myself going another 3 days in a row up to this peak 2492m