I am the one that heard it last night, now I am questioning what it was I did hear, but my reaction was to what I did here was a huge yippeeee! I have looked all day myself everywhere and see no reporting about this. Do you suppose this case has made me lose my mind? I certainly hope not!
I just checked and don't see any filings at the Orange County Clerk of Court. Weird!!!
GreenTurtleGirl, please update us if you hear anything else on the news. Thanks!
This was posted at the clerk's site (I included the 9/15 order by hhjp for reference....
9/20/2011 Response
Defendant's; to State's Notice of Filing of Revised Investigative Costs Expense Reports of the Orange County Sheriff's Office
09/19/2011 Notice of Filing
of Revised Investigative Costs Expense Reports of the Orange County Sheriff's Office Pursuant to Court Order of September 15, 2011
09/15/2011 Order Granting
in Part and Denying in Part State of Florida's Amended Motion to Tax Special Costs of Investigation and Prosecution and to Reserve Jurisdiction
link for reference, you must enter the data to pull up the case
http://www.myorangeclerk.com/enu/Pages/orange-county-clerk-of-court-home.aspx
Wonder if Lisabeth ratcheted up her whining with this new filing. I admit I rather enjoy her ranting and reminding the Court about what to consider. I also love when Judge Perry puts her back in her newbie spot. :great:
Perhaps DR Phil agreed to pay costs in exchange for the interview.
Well, here it is as posted back a page in this thread - you can read it for yourself - she didn't really even get wound up for this argument - IMO.
http://www.cfnews13.com/static/artic...pense-0920.pdf
I guess when Judge Perry said $100k after her little "$50 call it even" mandate.. she lost some wind in her sails. Thanks LG.. :blowkiss: I guess I missed the link. :blushing:
Welcome IfIMay - it seemed just like a silly motion after HHJP was so comprehensive about why he made his last decision.....So she is arguing again there is something wrong with his decision making process?
"The Defendant was charged with four misdemeanor counts of lying to Yuri Melich during a missing persons investigation; she was not charged with allowing a missing person investigation to continue". ooh... Lisabeth's got her back up. She's more and more like her mentor, Cheney, every day. Soon she'll graduate to er.. finger pointing!
She was not charged with allowing a missing person investigation to continue??
Um...what charge would that be? IMO, when someone makes a statement to LE, that person is hoping the investigation will go in a specific direction. In this case, lying about a child being missing caused a missing child investigation to commence. Ongoing lies caused said missing child investigation to continue.
LE knew Casey was lying about certain things but even so they really had no evidence that Caylee was not in fact a missing child. They HAD to proceed as if she was missing. Casey's lies instigated the missing child investigation and her continued lies kept it going. Casey not only "allowed" the investigation to continue, she encouraged it by her actions.
Seriously - I know Ms Fryer is a newbie Lawyer, but is that not one of the silliest statements you have seen in motion?
http://www.myorangeclerk.com
Case No. 2008-CF-015606-A-O
OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
09/28/2011 Hearing (3:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Perry, Belvin, JR)
09/22/2011 Order Amending Special Costs of Investigation for the OCSO
Okiedokie - our faithful news reporter, pasted this in This Weeks News a day or so ago, and I'm surprised to see we are not yet talking about it - but I guess everybody's "mad on" at the Anthony's is overshadowing this news...
I think this is a new order but I can't find it yet...
Hearing on the 28th with HHJP!:crush:
I saw this and it was referenced somewhere in a thread, but I have searched/googled and not yet seen the OSCO broken-down list JP asked for detailing the hours spent so JP could assess an additional OSCO $$ amount they are asking. apparently it has been filed with JP, and then Lisbeth also filed a DT motion about the funds Casey should pay.
When I looked at this I thought the hearing on the 28th is about unsealing the jail video when Casey hears about remains being found and has some kind of panic attack, or maybe a gran mal seizure :floorlaugh:
I don't know what new discussion we could have about these 2 items because we cannot find the actual OSCO new document filed.
MOO
My point exactly! But I was hoping it was just me that was unable to find these documents - but I assume the hearing was about L. Fryer complaining about the amounts ordered, but I could be wrong. Maybe it is just because I am sick to death of discussing the Anthony's that I am searching around for anything at all to discuss? IMO the Anthony's are a no-win, never solve subject - we are all rational intelligent beings and they are...well....