geevee
Well-Known Stickie
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
- Messages
- 17,597
- Reaction score
- 16,389
They were looking at the time gap. Flores questioned her about it in the interview. But whether they did look at it wasn't my point. My point was that I believe she'd had to consider as part of her alibi that they'd look at it.
Ryan did not say anything in testimony that she said anything to the effect of spending another night anywhere else.
What I'm discussing is part of her premeditation. I cannot understand why she'd indicate to Ryan that she'd be there straight away. She even said in court that she'd intended to be to Ryan straight away.
The problem is, there's no call to or from Travis AFTER her Ryan call to change that plan. Remember when she told us that she told Travis, "I'm coming to Mesa" and she said he said, "Really?"
So that talk happened according to her phone records BEFORE she called Ryan. (I know her and Travis did not have that conversation, but this is why she said.)
So I don't get why call Ryan after that and say she was coming. Either she thought she'd only be about 5 or so hours late, or she'd changed her mind about the murder, then on the drive to Utah, changed it back and went on to Mesa.
I know she began with premeditation. I can see her having second thoughts, telling Ryan she'll be there, then as she drove, she decided, nope. I'm killing him, just like I planned.
If not one of these two things, I don't know what else makes sense.
I understand exactly what you mean and I don't get it either, I am doubtful she was 'maybe si, maybe no' on her way to Travis' but I don't get either why she'd give Ryan a time that wasn't possible for her to be at his place with her plan of going to Mesa.