And, speaking of, did they do forensic analysis on that? They want us to think he cleaned the car after hauling her, that is what they are leaving in the air, so I would hope they did. You can never get everything out of those. What would he have done with anything he vaccumed out?
Actually, I have the hots for Judge Stubbs.
I loved her voice and style.
Det. Daniels is becoming impatient with Kurtz and this entire line of questioning.
Do you know the relevance of that line of questioning?
I think K's strategy at this point is to annoy and bore the jurors to death. It will only be through their death that his client has a hope of delaying the inevitable.
You know who cooked Mr. Cupper's goose?
Mr. Cupper himself.
Probably the first and last meal he ever cooked.
I agree, and I am wondering if he is convicted if this may come back on appeal as a violation of his 5th Amendment right agaisnt self discrimination.
We listened to how many hours of hashed and rehashed testimony that now has to be addressed. Kurtz is pointing out inconsistencies between Det. notes and narrative reports, testimony, etc. that is very relevant
He is trying to irritate Daniels
Do you think that he has pointed out any discrepancies that make a difference? I am getting so bored that I am tuning it out.We listened to how many hours of hashed and rehashed testimony that now has to be addressed. Kurtz is pointing out inconsistencies between Det. notes and narrative reports, testimony, etc. that is very relevant