Originally Posted by less0305
t - clear as day:
A man and woman are having a very rough spot in their marriage to the point where there are affairs,
money problems, seeking out attorneys for separation agreements/divorce advice, talk of "hate" to anyone who would
listen, and hiding passports, important papers, etc. Suddenly the woman goes missing the day after a fight over the
fact that the man did not give the woman the expected allowance. The man NEVER EVER withdrew the money from his
bank - not that Friday when it was expected, and neither on Saturday when his wife was just "on a run or out with her friends." Coincidental?
The man removes the woman from all money accounts, bank accounts, credit cards - and doesn't tell her himself. Coincidental?
The man is agreeable to a separation and the woman taking children back to Canada until he sees a copy of a draft
separation agreement that would have him paying out 75 % of his income in child support and expenses and has a provision
for alimony, at which time he cancels all plans for the woman to be able to leave. Coincidental?
The man mops, cleans, scours, launders the very day his wife becomes missing when it's not usually in his nature to
be THE main housekeeper. Coincidental?
The man can't find his wife and makes some attempt to ride around and look for her - and yet when his cell phone rings
he doesn't answer it, and when he realizes it is a call from a police officer, doesn't return the call immediately.
Coincidental?
The man makes two trips to a Harris Teeter which happens to capture his image on camera on the very morning his wife becomes
missing. Coincidental?
The man wears odd clothes for the weather and changes shoes between trips to the store within a 15 min. time frame. Coincidental?
The man tells officers his wife went jogging. No running shoes can be UNACCOUNTED for except two left shoes. Coincidental?
The woman is found wearing only a jogging bra - no SHOES, no pants, no undies, no socks. Coincidental?
The man happens to name the exact clothing item his wife was wearing when found dead after he told police officers he did not see her
leave the home. Coincidental?
The man has neck scratches and a bandaid on his finger. Coincidental?
The man informs police that he and his wife for the last couple months have been getting along fine and any marital
discord hasn't taken place. Coincidental?
The man tells police that he doesn't know how to access the call history on his cellular phone when he clearly is an expert
in his technological field dealing with phones, prototype phones, video phones. Coincidental?
The man is not truthful with police regarding his phone calls and movements in the day and hours leading up to his wife's
disappearance. Coincidental?
The man was the last person to have seen or spoke to the woman before she became missing. Coincidental?
The woman disappeared during an unplanned run alone, when her normal pattern was to run with one of a couple different running
partners. Coincidental?
The man does not notify the woman's family for assistance in locating his missing wife. Coincidental?
Items seen less than 24 hours before the woman became missing were removed from a foyer area of the home. Coincidental?
The man gave two to three descriptions of clothes the woman wore the night before. Coincidental?
The woman showed no signs of sexual assault, her missing clothing (for a run) were never found, expensive diamond earrings
remained on her body. Coincidental?
The woman died from strangulation (considered a soft kill where no blood evidence is left behind). Coincidental?
The man described his route to the grocery stores and yet his car was seen in video coming from a different direction.
Coincidental?
The man discloses he has cleaned the trunk of his car in the recent past. Coincidental?
The man shows no emotion that the mother of the children he adores is missing and then later found dead. Coincidental?
The man does not attend a memorial service for a woman he had been married to for years and was the mother of his
children. Coincidental?
The man has inconsistent stores relating to his actions between 8:00 p.m. on the night before his wife went missing and until
the early morning hours of the morning she went missing. Coincidental?
The man refused to speak with police officers after only a few days and never once contacts police to determine how the
investigation into the woman's disappearance/death is going. Coincidental?
The man and the woman have been seen screaming obscenities to each other on multiple occasions. Coincidental?
The man and the woman were seen to have a disagreement/argument on the night before her disappearance. Coincidental?
The man makes inquiries as to how to wipe hard drives. Coincidental?
The man purchases equipment that is related to the activity of re-routing phone calls and spoofing calls from one location
and to appear to be placed from another location? Coincidental?
The man sets up routing of calls through a foreign country, makes test calls, has the capibility, equipment, and knowledge
to spoof a call to himself. Coincidental?
The man accesses the woman's email accounts serendipidtously and forwards all e-mails to his own e-mail account for
over three months until her death. Coincidental?
The woman's time of death is estimated to be between 1 a.m. and 6 a.m. Coincidental?
The man happens to be in possession of a diamond necklace that the woman did not take off for runs. Coincidental?
The man states under oath he was asleep between 8:30 p.m. and 4 a.m. and computer forensics prove he was logged into his
computer four times between 10 p.m. and 12 a.m. Coincidental?
The man spends the day and days after the woman disappears searching jobs in Canada, flights for Air Canada, power washing his house,
internet boards regarding the woman's disappearance and death. Coincidental?
The man told countless lies in a sworn deposition regarding the events surrounding his marriage and events of the woman's death.
Coincidental?
Add to the long list less0305 posted...so many, it's hard to keep them straight. But here are 3 that should be at the top of the list.
1- Her diamond necklace was recovered by CPD, tucked away in a drawer with her other jewelry. This same necklace was said by many close to her , including her immediate family, that she NEVER removed. She wore it 24/7 - running, bathing, swimming, sleeping. To think this was the first time she removed it, flunks the smell test.
2- The light colored shoes w/ distinct, large navy trim were never recovered. CPD identified the shoes from video after the home SW was completed. No problem, immediately after his arrest in October, they conducted another search, specifically looking for these shoes . Guess what? The shoes he wore to HT were never found. Must have thrown 'em away. Hmmm.
3- Det. Chappell: At 1:15pm on July 11, Brad accessed photos of Fielding Drive (where Nancy's body found) from his Cisco laptop
