BZ didn't slip testimony in saying that an FXO supportable router was present, he said a router. Unless I totally misunderstood, but bottomline, that was inappropriate of BZ to say before the jury, he is not an expert witness.
The jury was out at the time.
Defense brought objections to two future witnesses: the bird-man (rebuttal witness) and recall of cisco employee to testify to recently found VPN records.
BZ just argued against the objections.