Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm sorry, but spying and murdering are two very different things. Those of us who want some more concrete evidence that Brad actually murdered Nancy see the difference between the two. I am insulted to have my sense of character & morality questioned for that.
He is trying to throw total confusion into this and mess with everyone's head, he isn't making any sense in his questioning.
Brad Im'd the security guy and asked him how to wipe disk so nothing can be recovered and was asked "do people normally ask you how to do this" and he said "no employees don't"
Kurtz is making no sense!
well not tech sense
Kurtz is making no sense!
well not tech sense
Kurtz is making no sense!
well not tech sense
I didn't catch that.... what was BC's look???
Kurtz is not doing well...
I'm sorry, but spying and murdering are two very different things. Those of us who want some more concrete evidence that Brad actually murdered Nancy see the difference between the two. I am insulted to have my sense of character & morality questioned for that.
It also could have been how he called home from France while he was over there without having to pay long distance.
I know..Even the witness doesnt know what the heck he means??..I'll bet Brad made out the list of questions to ask..LOL
My husband (works at Cisco) is in Germany now and he calls me from his computer and it shows as his Cisco local office number on my phone.
It was that "I can't BELIEVE you kept that chat" look. :wink:
This guy could work part time announcing golf tournaments on weekends, lol.
Why would anyone have a need to know how to completely clean up after himself but not for criminal reasons? The way I see it, but for a crime, no one would have known about any of this. The encryption, the wiping of discs. Maybe I'm not understanding all this technical stuff correctly. But for the commission of a crime, there would have been no reason to have a need to encrypt or wipe anything, right?
Why would anyone have a need to know how to completely clean up after himself but not for criminal reasons? The way I see it, but for a crime, no one would have known about any of this. The encryption, the wiping of discs. Maybe I'm not understanding all this technical stuff correctly. But for the commission of a crime, there would have been no reason to have a need to encrypt or wipe anything, right?
Like you would want an eye witness, which hardly ever happens in spouse murders
or a confession...is the concrete proof you would need..could you use common sense (which the jury has been asked to do)
they probably could have gotten him to confess but he was smart enough not to go to the station to be questioned