Very positive, indeed!
Having said that, you never know what a jury will do.
Based on my scan of the faces and body language, they seem to be a good cross section of "ordinary folks".
Soooo, such a mix should favor the state (no obvious prison brides or idiots that could not connect the dots).
There has been a lot of evidence that seems peripheral to the actual case. We know that Jason was unfaithful, that he lies, that he provoked arguments, that he didn't fight for custody, that his mother has lots of money, that he was labelled a slayer without a trial ... and on and on ... but the jury may decide to push all of that aside and look at whether there is evidence that he drove from the hotel to Raleigh and back in the middle of the night. I believe there is still a weakness in connecting those dots.