fran
Former Member
iirc, in the first trial, the Judge issued a jury instruction that they could only use his refusal to talk to police to determine his credibility. They could not use it as evidence of guilt.
JMO
edited to add: there was much testimony from friends/family that JY was advised by the friends to lawyer up before he got back to Raleigh. That's why the Judge issued that instruction, imo.
OK, kinda' the same thing, to me. I know it doesn't mean guilt, but it definitely speaks volumes to me.
Oh, fwiw, I was dismissed in a trafficing/grand theft auto/ identity theft case as I couldn't honestly say IF he'd not testified in his own behalf, I wouldn't hold it against him. I was being honest and because of a RL experience by someone I know. Of course the fact that one of the witnesses worked in the forensic lab with my daughter may have had something to do with it too!
Thanks for the info,
fran