CoolJ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2012
- Messages
- 4,241
- Reaction score
- 2,132
I did NOT deliberately misstate anything. Please point me to exactly what you think I misstated that you said.
I don't know what SA has lied about, I think I have stated this before. I also do not know anything more than you about the fire on the 31st, I know what everyone said in the beginning, I saw the progression of how the fire got larger as the interviews went on, I know what Radandt has stated about the fire, I know what is available to us in the documents, I still cannot say with certainty that there was a fire or not that night, that is my judgement call based on everything I have read, including SA's statements and Zellner's motions.
I do not believe that scent dogs are 100% accurate, or cadaver dogs, I do believe there are some good threads here on websleuths that may answer that question (might be in the Parking lot)
DNA maybe 100%, but let's be real here, there is way more to this case than clear cut "his DNA was there, so case closed". There are more factors involved, including planting, the lab, transporting of evidence, etc. I wish it was just that clear, but it's not IMO.
Just to further correct with regards to the fire. Not only did the size of the fire progress as the interviews went along but in many of the initial interviews there was no fire on Oct 31.
It went from no fire, to 3 feet high, to 5 feet high to 12 feet high LOL
We now have at least 1 witness who has said they were pressured by LE to exaggerate the size of the fire.
I mean, most 12 yr olds can see the deception in this case.... why are some refusing to see it?