BetteDavisEyes
Fasten your seatbelts...
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2010
- Messages
- 35,836
- Reaction score
- 82,161
Could the FBI interview Mrs. Kavanaugh, or is she protected by spousal privilege?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The FACT is her yearbook is online. That’s what I said.
I think when considering a nominee the most important part is to review past cases and their demeanor and fairness toward both sides at the time. Plus their knowledge of the law and demeanor on the bench.
16 of his opinions in the WDC..appellate court was also adopted in the majority opinions of the SC as well. That is an amazing achievement.
Even defense attorneys have said JK is a fair judge. I haven't seen anyone who has appeared before him in the last 12 years say otherwise.
He is known for his calm temperament giving respect to both sides. Like he said...the one who has the law on their side will be the one who wins. That is how any judge should rule
Not one who interprets the law and how they want it read but upholds the laws as they are written.
Even though he showed anger and emotional sadness in his latest testimony when he personally was being attacked and accused imo that has nothing to do with his temperance when he is in a courtroom.. He is well known to consistently have the demeanor needed to be a good judge that listens closely to each side of the argument.
Imo the worst thing for anyone would be if they felt they were being falsely accused of a sex crime they insist they did not do. So I found his anger justified and anyone accused of the same would be madder than heck if they knew those claims were false. It showed JK.....as a human being who hurts and feels anger like everyone does during traumatic times in their lives.
The situation for him and Dr. Ford were totally different situations.. She was handled with kid gloves by both parties...rightly so.
He faced 10 crouching tigers ready to spring to attack him and they did just like he had seen them do in the media for many days before he was finally allowed to testify again.
No one seem to care that he and his family were also getting death threats during the time he had to wait to testify again.
Imo
I need short baby answers
hard to ask questions when one is not really sure ehat they are asking
cause everything is a mess in my mind how all this works
randomly!
so witnesses in this tragedy:
if they say they are cooperating
can they say they wont go under oath
is that still considered cooperating
can they say they will cooperate and then take the fifth
the fifth stuff is insane
like with all the other DC stuff
if x happens and they try to plead the fifth they can go to jail
but in some other scenario they can plead the fifth and that is fine
so then with Judge he is at risk for being involved so does his lawyer try to tell them he will talk as long as he is under immunity
WIth the male bonding that this group apparently "did" much of it appears to be about conquest - so I really can imagine after she escaped from the rapist the conversation going like man i gave it to her she loved it bla bla
so then that could make all of em like accomplices or something
Calender: do any of you know the first and last names of the names on calendar
tia
The title of this tread is Supreme Court Nominee, not Brett Kavenaugh FBI investigation. So I don't think anyone is off topic to show evidence of why he is unsuited to the postition of Supreme Court Justice.
#1, Someone on this or the #1 thread posted "Falsus in uno, Falsus in omnibus." In that light I beleive that weather he is a liar or not reflects upon the veracity of his response to the sexual assault allegations. (let alone the coroboration of his heavy drinking)
#2. Brett Kavanaugh is not and will not be a non partisan arbiter.
"Both Ted and Brett had what one could only be called an unhealthy obsession with the Clintons — especially Hillary. While Ted was pushing through the Arkansas Project conspiracy theories claiming that Clinton White House lawyer and Hillary friend Vincent Foster was murdered (he committed suicide), Brett was costing taxpayers millions by pedaling the same garbage at Starr's office."
"Kavanaugh was not a dispassionate finder of fact but rather an engineer of a political smear campaign. And after decades of that, he expects people to believe he's changed his stripes."
Opinion | David Brock: The Brett Kavanaugh I knew shouldn't sit on the Supreme Court
Could the FBI interview Mrs. Kavanaugh, or is she protected by spousal privilege?
Her personal yearbook?
P
NAMES ON CALENDAR (sorry, I don't know how to snip, and I just saw you added this part).
Yes, I know the full names of all those listed on K"s calendar for July 1, 1982, anyway, and those folks are likely the most relevant. But, TOS I think applies to posting their names or sleuthing them? Do I have that latter part right or not?
Christine Blasey-Ford took a polygraph. Should Brett Kavanaugh take a polygraph?
David brock- american liberal political consultant
& founded mediamatters.
Mediamatters funded by soros.
No Thank You.
I posted them upthread. They are in the “annotated” WaPo calendar story. Some probably aren’t sleuthable per ToS. The names he listed most frequently are already quite public, like Judge.
ETA link, calendar images and prior post:
View attachment 149086
View attachment 149085
View attachment 149087
View attachment 149088
Analysis | Kavanaugh’s 1982 calendar, annotated
Among the people named repeatedly are Mark Judge (“Judge”), a classmate of Kavanaugh’s who is now a conservative writer — and who was said to have been at the party where the alleged assault occurred. Another alleged attendee was Patrick Smyth (“PJ”), also a classmate. There are also repeated references to Chris Garrett (“Squi”), who played on the football team with Kavanaugh.
David brock- american liberal political consultant
& founded mediamatters.
Mediamatters funded by soros.
No Thank You.
Media Matters for America is a progressive tax-exempt, nonprofit organization, with the stated mission of "comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media". Wikipedia