Suspect #1: Dellen Millard *Charged* 1st Deg Murder 15 May 2013 #1

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Strangulation from behind is also a very real possibility. Either way, TB would've had to leave behind some real evidence, in the way of blood or fluids, for LE to feel so confident he died in the truck. I'm not seeing what else would make them feel that way.
 
I truly believe that the eliminatorwas used , however i do think they didnt have experience with machine,, see clip from toronto sun .. clip says manner in which they disposed of body make the hair on the back of our neck stand up . makes you wonder dont it . what else except some thing like insinerator could shock cops.

the wood chipper.
 
Kavanagh told CP24 that police are working on an “asset forfeiture” aspect of the case.
 
I'm wondering if the "3rd" truck was the same make and model as TB's.
 
that's what I thought too but according to the Star article (as posted by Eldee, thanks for that) it isn't uncommon for people sitting in jail to move their assets into the names of someone they trust to conduct day-to-day business. But you're right though, the article doesn't mention how DM got the money for said assets in the 1st place, which is part of the asset forfeiture aspect of the investigation. Could very well have been drugs. JMO
 
A reporter/crime specialist for CP24 twitted some information about LE. Maybe there will be an extended report from her too.

sorry, if I will ruin WS rules

"3rd suspect in #Bosma murder still not identified, according to Staff Sgt. Matt Kavanagh." @suesgambati
 
The Star is aware of two other properties owned by Millard that remain in his name: a six-unit residential property on Riverside Road and the Ayr farm where Bosma's badly burned body was found.

If DM was moving his properties into his mothers hands, why would he leave these 2 in his own. I can understand the farm, as it is in the middle of an investigation, but why the 6 plex, why not hand it over with the others????

In prison, Millard has been placed in isolation "for his own protection," Paradkar added.
"It's very difficult," Paradkar said. "He's got nothing to do.

Well DM....might as well get used to it.....welcome to your future!!!!!

http://www.thespec.com/news-story/3255771-millard-s-land-deal-bombshell/
 
Kavanagh told CP24 that police are working on an “asset forfeiture” aspect of the case.

http://www.opp.ca/ecms/index.php?id=55

The Asset Forfeiture Unit was established in 2001 and is an OPP led Joint Forces Operation. It is comprised of 43 officers from the OPP and 16 municipal police agencies from across the province.

Profit is one of the primary motivators for criminal activity. Depriving criminals of wealth acquired through crime is a crime reduction strategy. The criminal economy poses a serious threat to the safety and security of Ontario communities and as such, all deterrents to crime, including asset seizure, should be aggressively pursued.

Investigators of the AFU provide guidance, expertise and leadership on the various methods available to seize assets for their eventual forfeiture. They support various substantive units, such as drug enforcement, fraud, gaming, *advertiser censored*, weapons, auto theft, regional/detachment crime units, regional/municipal police services, and front-line officers.

According to link here - http://www.hamiltonpolice.on.ca/NR/rdonlyres/46BA6465-01A2-4B9D-AC6F-6C4C88881627/0/August9_AgendaPublic.pdf - Police Services Board Report #10-070, Aug 2010 -

Hamilton Police Service is a member of the Provincial Asset Forfeiture Team (described above) whose mandate is to seize, restrain, and forfeit the proceeds of crime and offence-related property, and to investigate money laundering offences. Most of the Unit's seizures and restraints involve residential houses, cash and motor vehicles... but report goes on to say that the Unit has also restrained buildings containing businesses.
 
wow, so perhaps DM is involved with dealing drugs, that's why he can buy his so many properties!
IMO, they may have enough information with the chop shop to proceed with "proceeds of crime" laws. Ontario has a very tough law and that's probably what they're investigating right now. No need to even be convicted-just based on probability : http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/20070824_CRIA_Update.pdf

Here's the OPP's site: http://www.opp.ca/ecms/index.php?id=55
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
159
Guests online
1,866
Total visitors
2,025

Forum statistics

Threads
601,946
Messages
18,132,373
Members
231,191
Latest member
TCSouthtrust
Back
Top