swedie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2011
- Messages
- 5,472
- Reaction score
- 279
It's been some time since I last posted, I find this "bought some landscaping stones" interesting. Could some one please re-link or post links to the equipment photos from the farm. The excavator and the bobcat. Just a hunch "boulders.ca" has similar equipment and they deliver stones, rent skid steers, bobcats and possibly excavators.
They are in Oakville & mississauga. cheers
Welcome back Napper. It's worth turning over every stone to figure out how it came to be Tim ended up being the very unfortunate victim in this case. The landscaping stone theory has come up in the past along with other speculations. One I had considered was the fact Tim was an HVAC mechanic. Had he done work at the hangar; installation of the heating, cooling system when it was built or had he done repair work on the system prior to his murder? IMO I don't believe there was anything which connected them other then the accused wanting a Dodge Ram truck. If it wasn't Tim I believe it would have been someone else. They may not have been murdered but would have lost their Dodge truck and been abandoned somewhere.
Something to consider; test drive of the Dodge Ram the day before with the business owner and another person who came forward stating he had been contacted about his Dodge Ram truck which was for sale. Why would the accused take the risk of being witnessed/caught if their intention was to get back at or murder Tim for a business deal gone wrong? It doesn't seem to fit IMHO. Why even use the truck as an excuse? Why not just find a more convenient way to snuff him out?
We do know Tim had a friend who had a pilot's license, had taken Tim up in a small plane and if there ever was a time in which DM and TB's paths crossed, it could have been through this pilot friend who had a connection to the Waterloo airport. During the theft of Tim's truck, did Tim suggest to DM he recognized him from the Waterloo airport? At that point had the theft been obvious to Tim and there was no turning back for DM and/or MS and they believed they had no other option but to murdered Tim and take the chance of getting away with murder then facing charges of auto theft and forcible confinement (which also carries a hefty sentence; life)? Especially if a weapon such as a gun was involved.
I do not believe it was the original intent for Tim to be murdered and this could explains why the crime was sloppy leaving so much incriminating evidence behind. I won't be surprised to learn during the course of the trial the defense tries to paint it Tim's death was accidental or he was murdered in self defense. Tim ended up being shot because one or both of the accused lives were being threatened by Tim himself. At gunpoint Tim was ordered out of his truck, refused and a struggle ensued. There was no intention of the gun being used other then to threaten. Makes for a great defense when nothing else fits the evidence. Do I believe that to be fact; self defense or accidental? No, but that is JMHO. It will be a good attempt for raising reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors thought. I don't think it will be a long stretch either for the defense to try and claim Tim was armed with a gun either. Why would someone be so trusting and especially late at night to go out on a test drive with two strange men? That will be defense's rational. Someone armed with a gun? Where is Tim's gun now? Well just like in so many other cases, the evidence hasn't been found and never will be (because one doesn't exist). Not everyone who carries a gun registers them and their family members didn't even know they owned such a gun
Kidnapping
279. (1) Every person commits an offence who kidnaps a person with intent
(a) to cause the person to be confined or imprisoned against the persons will;
Punishment
(1.1) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable
(a) if a restricted firearm or prohibited firearm is used in the commission of the offence or if any firearm is used in the commission of the offence and the offence is committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with, a criminal organization, to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of...
(b) in any other case, to imprisonment for life.
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-279.html