CARIIS
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2012
- Messages
- 25,470
- Reaction score
- 10,693
But what is the purpose of saying he wrote something if he did not. We all must remember that right after he was in custudy he explained what they had done.Isabelle.. It's been edited to IMO. After all, no one is right or wrong here, it is a forum where all members are entitled to their opinions. Please provide these FBI links you speak of? I personally checked, and can view no new information the FBI have released since the criminal complaint was filed. Please do not accuse of us of not keeping in mind the victims - no one has been convicted of this crime at this stage. Some of us prefer to keep an open mind to each and every possibility. I highly doubt these new confession claims are true, the likelihood of him being in possession of any pen or locating a pen that would have the ingredients to mark certain surfaces of the boat appears slim and we have seen many photos of the boat after his capture, there is not one photo that displays this written confession? IMO!
It is like he never denied anything. The notion that a small room (his hospital room) with LE, a judge , cops everywhere, nursing staff, doctors, a court reporter would get together and make up all the confessing he did after capture.
There is no gain here, to make up he , like most terrorists, wanted everyone to know why they did what they did.Its a hallmark of terrorist attacks.
Further more what he reported intially in hospital room has thus far proven to be accurate.
There have been no discrepency between what they said he said to them in those first 72 hours in the hospital - so what would the reason be for saying he left note in boat and it is a "lie" ?