The 911 Call, LE Radio Call & Police Report

[Skully]

Who was last seen an hour and a half ago at 116 Tyler? Misty? Haleigh? Does anyone know what the number codes mean in Satsuma, such as signal 8 at 202 green lane?

Also, if you listen to the directions the dispatch lady is giving the officer she says there is a little dirt trail from Tyler to Green. Any locals that can interpret this please.

I don't know if the calls are the same, but I have a signals (dispatch codes) for Hernando

Signals 8J missing Juvenile

If you can catch any of it on the call, let me know and I can look it up for you.

 

[Whisperer]

It is clear that a patrol was at 116 tyler around about the time of the 911 call. The call says the child was missing about an hour and a half and the victim was wearing p.j's.

Maybe her brother knows way more than anyone thinks...

 

[Skully]

It is clear that a patrol was at 116 tyler around about the time of the 911 call. The call says the child was missing about an hour and a half and the victim was wearing p.j's.

Maybe her brother knows way more than anyone thinks...

Do you remember Belize?

 

[DotsEyes]

It just seemed to me that RC didn't want anything but for LE to show up and NOW! He told the operator "I was at work, I just got home, my daughter is missing, I need someone here now!" Everything else was irrelevant to him, he had given the operator everything he knew. When she asks "what was she wearing?" he is beside himself at the question as he just told her he was at work. I can hear his frustration.

At a moment like that I would be frustrated with questions like "what's her birthdate?" I mean really what could it matter at that point? The operator was already told she was 5 years old and MC had told her what HaLeigh was wearing. Otherwise, according to the analysis, the conversation should have gone like this:

"911, what is your emergency?"
"My daughter is missing."
"How old is your daughter?"
"She is 5 years old, born August 9th, 2004."
"When did she go missing?"
"I don't know, I was at work."
"What time did you get home from work?"
"3:25 this morning."
"What was she wearing?"
"I don't know, I was at work."
"Where was she taken from?"
"My house."
"Where in the house?"
"I don't know, Lady - I WAS AT WORK!"
"Where was she last seen?"
"I don't know, I WAS AT WORK!" (are you listening at all to me?)
"When is the last time you saw her?"
"Before I WENT TO WORK! Can somebody please come here now?"
"What was she wearing?"
"I don't know, I was at work!" (God, is anyone paying attention here?)


Instead, in a very few words, he told her all she needed to know to send help:
"I just got home from work and my daugher is missing, send someone now!"

 

[elle1919]

It just seemed to me that RC didn't want anything but for LE to show up and NOW! He told the operator "I was at work, I just got home, my daughter is missing, I need someone here now!" Everything else was irrelevant to him, he had given the operator everything he knew. When she asks "what was she wearing?" he is beside himself at the question as he just told her he was at work. I can hear his frustration.

At a moment like that I would be frustrated with questions like "what's her birthdate?" I mean really what could it matter at that point? The operator was already told she was 5 years old and MC had told her what HaLeigh was wearing. Otherwise, according to the analysis, the conversation should have gone like this:

"911, what is your emergency?"
"My daughter is missing."
"How old is your daughter?"
"She is 5 years old, born August 9th, 2004."
"When did she go missing?"
"I don't know, I was at work."
"What time did you get home from work?"
"3:25 this morning."
"What was she wearing?"
"I don't know, I was at work."
"Where was she taken from?"
"My house."
"Where in the house?"
"I don't know, Lady - I WAS AT WORK!"
"Where was she last seen?"
"I don't know, I WAS AT WORK!" (are you listening at all to me?)
"When is the last time you saw her?"
"Before I WENT TO WORK! Can somebody please come here now?"
"What was she wearing?"
"I don't know, I was at work!" (God, is anyone paying attention here?)


Instead, in a very few words, he told her all she needed to know to send help:
"I just got home from work and my daugher is missing, send someone now!"

Thanks Dot.....did you transcribe the radio transmissions as well? I would really like to read those but can't find them.

 

[elle1919]

Okay I found the version of the radio transcript Dot did down in the RT. Mods I hope it is okay to post here?

I transcribed the police radio transmission. OP=dispatch. MLE=male LE. FLE=female LE. Single digit numbers behind MLE or FLE correspond to the different deputies responding to call. S = Sgt. Blanks are where words were garbled. Numbers beginning with 12 are individual officers’ ID numbers, those beginning with 11 denote rank of Sgt. When OP or anyone else calls out an 11 or 12 number that officer responds with his/her number – usually. Later I may get around to posting the times, if anyone is interested. But, you have to let me know if you are.

OP: 1271. 265. Signal 8.
MLE1: 1271.
OP: 202 Green Lane. 2 zero 2 Green Lane. The complainant’s advising she cannot find her 5 year old daughter. The backdoor is open at this time.
MLE1: 10:4. _______51_____code _____17.
OP: It’s 51 code. Sierra 1120.
MLE1: 10:26. Go ahead and advise 1118, I believe she is in the squad room.
OP: 1118.
FLE1: I’m 10:26. I’ll be 10:8 in just a couple. 10:51.
OP: 10:4. 1256.
FLE1: You got a cross street?
OP: Buffalo Bluff Road to Tyler Street, left on Monroe Avenue. It’s going to be in Satsuma.
MLES: Sierra 1120.
OP: 1120.
MLES: I got the age on this kid. Is it a boy or girl?
OP: Whiskey Foxtrot. Last seen wearing her PJ’s.
MLE: 10:4.
FLE2: Advice 1256.
OP: 1256.
FLE2: There is a railroad that runs right through there. Can we find out from CSA(?) when next train come through?
OP: 10:4. It just passed through.
MLES: (short static)
OP: Sierra 1120.
MLES: Sierra 1120.
OP: Can you 10:21?
MLES: 10:4.
FLE1: Lima 1118. 10:8. 10:51. Back.
OP: 10:4.
MLES: Sierra 1120.
OP: Arvan(?) 20.
MLE1: I’m back en route now to that signal 8. Where is that located at in Satsuma?
OP: 202 Green Lane. From Buffalo Bluff Road to Tyler Street, left on Monroe.
MLE1: 10:4. I’m not but a couple blocks. 10:4.
MLE1: 471 located 10:97.
OP: 10:4. 1297.
OP: 1271 or 1256 to 13.
MLE1: 77.
OP: cool. (?)
OP: Sierra 1120.
MLES: Sierra 1120.
OP: When you get to 97, can you give us an update?
MLES: They’re 77, they just haven’t located yet, but they’re 77.
OP: 10:4.
OP: Call back 1256. 1256. ____telephone____ordinary. Want me to call it in for you? 10:4.
FLE2: 1256.
FLE2: I’m available at 116 Tyler.
OP: 116 Tyler? (static) 26.
MLE1: What’s going on at 116?
FLE2: 1256.
OP: Go head.
FLE2: 10:08 from this location, going 97, back to Green.
OP: 10:4. Verifying the last time she was seen ____address.
FLE2: She was seen within her residence, about 1 to 1 1/2 hours ago..
OP: 10:4.
MLES: Sierra 1120 to Lima 1118.
OP: Lima 1118. Sierra 1120. She advises 10:84. 1118 was not working earlier.
MLES: Why not? (or what?)
FLE1: Lima 1118.
OP: 1118.
FLE2: Reference call at 19 and 20. We believe it’s gonna all be in the city. If not, let us know. So far.
OP: So far.
FLE2: She’ll 10:8 to 51 to the south end. Also, I’ve talked to a (or the) City Supervisor, they’ve got a K-9 10:8 that’s gonna be en route.
OP: 10:4.
FLE2: When you get a good 10:8 from this location, if ya’ll just give him driving directions to where he needs to go.
OP: 10:4.
(static)
OP: 10:4. Go ahead.
FLE2: It’s off of Tyler. Take left. It’s a little dirt trail which comes around to Green Lane. Come in at back.
OP: 10:4. Tyler, take left, dirt trail, advise take right.
FLE2: 10:4. ______the first dirt road.
OP: 1256. 10:80 to LA Tuck (?).
MLES: Sierra 1120 to 1271.
MLES: 1120 to 1271.
MLE3: 1271. Go ahead sir.
MLES: Stay at the residence, maintain that point of access, reference for (or to) K-9’s and do another thorough search from inside the house. (this is 6 minutes into the calls)
MLE3: That’s 10:4.
MLES: 1120 to 1256.
FLE2: Yes, Sgt.
MLES: Are you back at the uh, house?
FLE2: 10:4.
MLES: Is that 10:4 or 10:54?
FLE2: 10:4. I’m back on Green Lane.
MLES: 10:4. Go ahead and gather as much information as you can get about any family or anything around here and uh, go ahead and call in and get her reported a signal 8.
OP: 10:4. It’s already done, Sir..
FLE1: Lima 1118.
OP: 1118.
FLE1: Make contact with Sgt. Riles (sp?) and when he calls in, patch him through to my cell please.
OP: 10:4.
OP: 1118. I’m patching him through at this time.
FLE1: Thank you.
FLE1: 1118. 10:97.
OP: 10:4. 10:97. Sierra 1120 are you 10 on me, 7?
MLES: 1120. 10:97 area, hold on.
OP: 10:4.
OP: 1 kilo 22.
MLES: 1120 to 1390, 19.
MLE4: 1319. Yes, Sgt.
MLES: Come on down to Buffalo Bluff Road and 17. Just start taking tags or stopping vehicles that are leaving from this area.
MLE4: 10:29.
MLE4: 1319. Send me en route from San Mateo.
OP: 10:4.
MLE4: Caller 1319.
OP: 10:4. Caller 10:9 your location.
MLE4: We’re going to be on Buffalo Bluff, just off 17.
OP: 10:26. Thank you.
FLE1: Lima 1118.
OP: 1118.
FLE2: Can we check with St.John Valusia(sp?), see if they can put a chopper in the air for us.
OP: 10:4.
FLE@: Also, if you'd contact Tenner at home and tell him I need him to get a boat preparted that would go into canal areas, one of the small ones, and get activated and head down this way.
OP: 10:4
FLE!: Lima 1118.
MLES: 1120 SO.
OP: Lima 1118.
FLE1: Believe Valusia (SP?) has a flare unit, I’m, I’m not sure, if they don’t have one, you may want to check with Valusia first.
FLE3: Lima 1118. As for reference Valusia having a flare, I’ll make the 25 on that. I’m trying to get Deputy Tenner on the phone.
FLE1: Okay. Thanks. 10:4.
MLES: Sierra 1120 SO.
OP: 1120.
MLES: When ya’ll make contact with uh, Deputy Tenner, advise him that it’s going to be east of the Hermit Cover Marine, in these canals, back on south/southwest of the railroad track.
OP: 10:20, Sir.
MLE5: 12, 1231.
OP: J91325, 1325, received at 3:27.
MLE: static
OP: 1231. Also, 1231 do you have a picture in reference to the Signal 8, so we can enter that.
MLE5: 10:4.
MLES: Sierra 1120.
OP: 1120.
MLES: If you would, pull us the roster for day shift, ‘cause they were working today, go ahead and make contact with the Zone 2, Zone 1, Zone 7 Officers, tell them to take a 10:08.
OP: 10:4.
MLES: _____1173.
MLE: 1173. 10:08, 10:51 at Green Street.
OP: 10:4 to 51.
MLE: static
OP: 1271.
MLE1: 1256. 10:51. In control officially. (garbled, may be incorrect)
OP: 10:26.

End of taped transmission.


Everyone just read knowing this may or may not be an accurate transcription, I have not finished trying to decipher it just yet but if anyone see's an error or something not quite right let me know and I will fix.

 

[DotsEyes]

OP: Call back 1256. 1256. ____telephone____ordinary. Want me to call it in for you? 10:4
FLE2: 1256.
FLE2: I’m available at 116 Tyler.
OP: 116 Tyler? (static) 26.
MLE1: What’s going on at 116?
FLE2: 1256.
OP: Go head.
FLE2: 10:08 from this location, going 97, back to Green.
OP: 10:4. Verifying the last time she was seen ____address.
FLE2: She was seen within her residence, about 1 to 1 1/2 hours ago..
OP: 10:4.

If one listens to the tape, it appears that the OP is answering MLE1 when he askes "what's going on at 116 Tyler?" and she responds "verifying the last time she was seen at _____ address."
There is talk over and such.

Of course, one to one and one half hours ago puts us at 2:10 - 2:40am, a time which no one says that they saw HaLeigh. Therefore I think it was an error on the part of the reporting witness. I do not think that anyone at Tyler saw HaLeigh at that time.

Since 1256 was responding to a "call back", that means she, FLE2, was at the scene of Tyler before this portion of the dispatch conversations.

 

[debs]

OP: Call back 1256. 1256. ____telephone____ordinary. Want me to call it in for you? 10:4
FLE2: 1256.
FLE2: I’m available at 116 Tyler.
OP: 116 Tyler? (static) 26.
MLE1: What’s going on at 116?
FLE2: 1256.
OP: Go head.
FLE2: 10:08 from this location, going 97, back to Green.
OP: 10:4. Verifying the last time she was seen ____address.
FLE2: She was seen within her residence, about 1 to 1 1/2 hours ago..
OP: 10:4.

If one listens to the tape, it appears that the OP is answering MLE1 when he askes "what's going on at 116 Tyler?" when she responds "verifying the last time she was seen at _____ address."

Of course, one to one and one half hours ago puts us at 2:10 - 2:40am, a time which no one says that they saw HaLeigh. Therefore I think it was an error on the part of the reporting witness. I do not think that anyone at Tyler saw HaLeigh at that time.

JMHO

Dots, I don't see how you can assume an error. "I do not think that anyone at Tyler saw HaLeigh at that time." ignores what is in fact being reported. Someone is stating she was last seen at that time. The question I ask is "Why is there such a discrepancy??" In my mind, this opens up two possibilities:

1. Someone else was at the MH that night.
2. Misty had HaLeigh at the Tyler street address that night.

The second of these possibilities takes into account what is written on the police report. One of the boxes checked indicates that whatever happened to HaLeigh did not happen in the MH.

 

[elle1919]

Dots, I don't see how you can assume an error. "I do not think that anyone at Tyler saw HaLeigh at that time." ignores what is in fact being reported. Someone is stating she was last seen at that time. The question I ask is "Why is there such a discrepancy??" In my mind, this opens up two possibilities:

1. Someone else was at the MH that night.
2. Misty had HaLeigh at the Tyler street address that night.

The second of these possibilities takes into account what is written on the police report. One of the boxes checked indicates that whatever happened to HaLeigh did not happen in the MH.

I am with you on this one debs, I don't see how we can assume there was an error either because PCSO themselves released this information. Typically I thought when they released little tidbits like this it was to get people talking and thinking about the case again. Maybe trigger a memory or thought that once might have been thought of as nothing and therefore not called in as a tip. However, this whole Tyler street mention in the radio transmissions has me thinking, someone correct me if I am wrong but....was there ALREADY a patrol unit out there on Tyler? That would certainly be a coinky-dink huh? The way I hear the transmission...it sounds like they are stating Haleigh was last seen at Tyler. Course this is all very confusing and I wish someone with knowledge of codes could help. Like what is 77, they are 77. Or 1256. I don't think that means the hour 12:56.

 

[Skully]

I am with you on this one debs, I don't see how we can assume there was an error either because PCSO themselves released this information. Typically I thought when they released little tidbits like this it was to get people talking and thinking about the case again. Maybe trigger a memory or thought that once might have been thought of as nothing and therefore not called in as a tip. However, this whole Tyler street mention in the radio transmissions has me thinking, someone correct me if I am wrong but....was there ALREADY a patrol unit out there on Tyler? That would certainly be a coinky-dink huh? The way I hear the transmission...it sounds like they are stating Haleigh was last seen at Tyler. Course this is all very confusing and I wish someone with knowledge of codes could help. Like what is 77, they are 77. Or 1256. I don't think that means the hour 12:56.

Are you sure it's 77? 10-97 is Arrived At Scene

 

[elle1919]

Are you sure it's 77? 10-97 is Arrived At Scene

lol.....I am not sure of anything. Arrived on scene would make sense though....a little.

 

[Skully]

I am reading this to mean that Haleigh was last seen at 2 to 2:30 that morning.

I think Misty may have looked in on the kids and then went out to go to Tyler street address. And the reference to 1 to 1 & 1/12 hours may be incorrect as well, meaning that is what he was told, no proof it is accurate.

FLE2: She was seen within her residence, about 1 to 1 1/2 hours ago....

 

[Skully]

lol.....I am not sure of anything. Arrived on scene would make sense though....a little.

No code 77 or Signal 77, so the only thing that would make sense in the context is 97.

 

[Donjeta]

one of the RTs had a link to a list of the PCSO radio codes, it was close to where DotsEyes transcription was. Could anyone find that?

 

[claudicici]

TEN CODE: 10-1 Reception Poor 10-2 Reception Good 10-3 Change Channels 10-4 Message Received 10-5 Relay Traffic 10-6 Busy 10-7 Out of Service 10-7a Lunch Break 10-7c Coffee Break 10-8 In Service 10-9 Repeat 10-10 Off Duty 10-12 Radio not clear (DO NOT USE) 10-13 Weather/ Road Conditions 10-14 Convoy/ Escort 10-15 Prisoner in Custody 10-16 Pick up Prisoner 10-17 Pick up Paperwork 10-19 Return to Station/At Station 10-20 Location 10-21 Landline 10-22 Disregard 10-23 Stand By - Busy 10-25 Are you Clear to Copy Information? 10-26 Read to Copy Information 10-27 DDL Information 10-28 Registration Information 10-29 Check for Wanted 10-32 Set up Road Block 10-34a Assist Officer - URGENT/CODE 3 10-35 SEND BACK-UP 10-36F Wanted for FELONY 10-36M Wanted for MISDEMEANOR 10-37 Time Check 10-39 Message Delivered/ Contact Made 10-42 Residence 10-97 Arrived On Call 10-98 Cleared Call
ELEVEN CODE: 11-13 Injured Animal 11-13D Dead Animal 11-14 Suspicious Person/ Activity 11-15 Open Building/ Residence 11-17 Wires Down 11-24 Abandoned Vehicle 11-25 Traffic Hazard 11-26 Traffic Stop 11-40 Is Ambulance Needed? 11-41 Send Ambulance 11-42 Ambulance Not Needed 11-44 Coroner's Case 11-45 Major Disaster 11-46 Suicide Attempt
6
11-47 Injured Person 11-48 Transport 11-64 Sign Down 11-65 Signal Down 11-79 Injury Accident - Ambulance Enroute 11-80 Major Injury Accident 11-81 Accident - No Injury 11-83 Accident - No Details 11-84 Direct Traffic 11-85 Send Tow Truck 11-97 Meet Citizen 11-98 Meet Officer 11-99 OFFICER DOWN - GIVE LOCATION TO ALL UNITS
VEHICLE CODES: 10851 Stolen Auto 10851 Vehicle Tampering 14601 Revoked/Suspended License 20001 Hit & Run/Felony 20002 Hit & Run/Prop.Damage 23152 Drunk Driving 23153 Felony Drunk Driving 23103 Reckless Driving 22350 Speeding 21956 Ped. in Roadway 23109 Speed Contest 23221 Drinking in Vehicle 23222 Open Container/Passenger 23223 Open Container, Marijuana/Driver
PENAL CODES: 187 Murder 207 Kidnap 211 Robbery 240 Assault 242 Battery 261 Rape 245 Assault W/Deadly Weapon 288 Lewd & Lascivious W/Child 415 Dist the Peace 459 Burglary 487 Grand Theft 272 Contributing to a Minor 273a Child Neglect 594 Malicious Mischief 647 Disorderly Conduct 647F Drunk in Public 647G Prowling 314 Indecent Exposure 5150 Mental Case
FIRE CODES: 904 Fire 905 Fire Out 7

 

[DotsEyes]

elle - 1256 is the officer's call number. Officer 1256.

 

[Skully]

I learned today that if you hear a 2220 that means, the first 2 is district, second 2 is shift, and 20 is the officer's call number. That is in Hernando, but It is probably the same for most Counties.

 

[TxLady2]

No code 77 or Signal 77, so the only thing that would make sense in the context is 97.

Actually, there is a 10-77... it means situation under control. It is used by Jacksonville, FL sheriff's dept., not listed on all other sites though. I found in my search for call codes, that some of these codes vary from one county to another, and one state to another.


http://www.bearcat1.com/radiofl.htm.

 

[Viki]

The FBI has gone to great pains to analyze 911 phone calls, after the fact of guilt or innocence has been adjudicated, so that LE and dispatchers alike can be better trained to respond with the appropriate level of attention as quickly as possible. As that research pertains to the elements of these 911 calls, there being more than one because of Ron's hangups, there are multiple red flags that the callers are guilty of something with reference to the calls, all of which I posted some time ago.

None of us has to wonder what we do nor do we need to compare these 911 calls to ones we have made. That's not data, that's just us guessing. The FBI analysis, on the other hand, is based on scientific research with valid and reliable results.

 

[Whisperer]

I will have to go back and look at that Viki. I am sure it is interesting. The FBI has researched the 911 calls people make and can tell if something is fishy on the calls?