Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
eve said:Anyone else ever hear about her ALWAYs using seat belts, but not this time? Seems pretty odd to me, especially since they say it would have saved her life AND that she had already told her butler she might die in a car accident that if she did, it wouldn't be an accident. I hardly think she'd not use the seat belt, given that. I also think the royals were very worried about her "loose lips" especially after her involvement w/ Dodi.
Eve
I dont know who is worse, him or camille....:waitasec: :sick: :sick:kazzbar said:Aw, come on Narla.Charles is sooooo delish!:sick: :sick:
:sick:
Scary thought of the day, Michelle. Charles and Camilla together!! Oh, Boy to think he may become king . People will have to curtsey to Camilla.:doh:michelle said::laugh: I dont know who is worse, him or camille....:waitasec: :sick: :sick:
:sick: :sick: :sick:kazzbar said:Scary thought of the day, Michelle. Charles and Camilla together!! Oh, Boy to think he may become king . People will have to curtsey to Camilla.:doh:![]()
![]()
narlacat said:Ex-butler admits to cashing in on Diana
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=108278
I've always liked Paul Burrell.
Does anyone know whose baby it was that Diana helped bury at Kensington Palace??
txsvicki said:I remember back when the accident first happened and a doctor said that Diana died from the blood in her aorta being pushed and it bursting. This was from the force of the accident and the speed that the car was going. He said that a seat belt wouldn't have prevented this and I'm wondering if there has been new reports about the seatbelt that I have missed?
I think we do know the truth as hard as it is to accept. It was just a senseless accident.kazzbar said:Narla, I recall something about a baby.
I think it was a friends. Poor Diana was just a breeder for the Royals. Imagine having Sex with Charles.Poor woman! He is a rich idiot with a small brain. I admire her for not accepting his stupid affair with horsey Camilla. She did a lot for charity and was not afraid to touch the 'lower classes'.Something the Queen seems to avoid.
The only good thing the Royals do is attract tourists.the 'Best One' has gone.
Diana should have been left alone to marry who she pleased not hounded.
We will NEVER know the truth of her death but there is more to it than meets the eye!IMO.
As for Burell I to liked him at first but he has 'sold' himself short recently. Did anyone see that telly show he did? It was called Australian Princess' and was a heap of polo horse doo doo.![]()
Try telling that to Dodi's Dad- Mohammed Al Fayad!Amraann said:I think we do know the truth as hard as it is to accept. It was just a senseless accident.
Its funny is someone famous dies ...its always a conspiracy .... But people are shot or die in vehicles or any number of freak accidental things and their deaths are hardly ever called into question as anything but an accident or the violent act of some criminal.
gliving said:September 25, 2006 10:45 a.m. EST
Maira Oliveira - All Headline News Reporter
London, England (BANG) - Even though a complete investigation is still pending, it was recently revealed that the body of Britain's Princess Diana's lover was confused with that of her driver's just hours after the fatal Paris car crash that took the princess' life nine years ago, in 1997.
Britain's Daily Express newspaper has revealed that French officials confused the body of Diana's lover Dodi Fayed and her driver Henri Paul, throwing the inquiry into chaos from the very beginning.
The pathologist in charge - Professor Dominique Lecomte - now faces investigation after it emerged he registered the body of driver Paul with the number 2146 the number already allocated to Fayed. The numbers were scrawled on bracelets attached to the right wrists of the bodies.
Now it is feared that blood samples taken from the corpses - which were said to prove Paul was high on drugs and alcohol when the car crashed in the tunnel in Paris - could have come from a body totally unrelated to the crash.
A lawyer who has been working on the case for nine years said, "This terrible error illustrated how overworked and inefficient many of the staff had become. When you're dealing with the death of the mother of the future King of Britain this is totally unacceptable."
A French legal source said, "If the French authorities were able to mix up Paul's body and Dodi Fayed's then it is pretty clear that they were able to mix up blood samples too."
Since the death of the princess, the British Royal family have been anxious for an inquest into her death to be held, so that the circumstances of her death can be known and her memory laid to rest. However, so many mistakes and problems have occurred during the nine-year investigation that an inquest is yet to be held. It is hoped preliminary hearings will take place early 2007.
He was a bodyguard, he lived but conveniently LOST HIS MEMORY remembered everything else but the crash.lostfaith said:I am really out of date on this topic, so someone update me please. I know there was a survivor of the crash, but is he still alive, or did he eventually die? Was it a bodygaurd? and if he did survive, what does he say?
eastender said:He was a bodyguard, he lived but conveniently LOST HIS MEMORY remembered everything else but the crash.
gliving said:September 25, 2006 10:45 a.m. EST
Now it is feared that blood samples taken from the corpses - which were said to prove Paul was high on drugs and alcohol when the car crashed in the tunnel in Paris - could have come from a body totally unrelated to the crash.
I've always thought the case was bungled from the beginning........Floh said:That is interesting! in fact it's the first interesting snippet i've heard about the case since the beginning and could change everything! :waitasec:
cheko1 said:I've always thought the case was bungled from the beginning........
I'm with Fayed's Dad...I think they were murdered.