Bringing over here: Sentinel reports that docs say that tape found on Caylee, matches tape on gas can.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...asey-anthony-discovery-021809,0,5750058.story
The only match here is the fact that this duct tape is sold in every hardware store in Florida. The "chemical" match is junk science. It will not easily fly in a court anymore:
http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=12589
"WASHINGTON --
A congressionally mandated report from the National Research Council finds serious deficiencies in the nation's forensic science system and calls for major reforms and new research. Rigorous and mandatory certification programs for forensic scientists are currently lacking, the report says, as are strong standards and protocols for analyzing and reporting on evidence....." "Moreover, many forensic science labs are underfunded, understaffed, and have no effective oversight...."
"...Forensic evidence is often offered in criminal prosecutions and civil litigation to support conclusions about individualization -- in other words, to "match" a piece of evidence to a particular person, weapon, or other source. But with the exception of nuclear DNA analysis, the report says,
no forensic method has been rigorously shown able to consistently, and with a high degree of certainty, demonstrate a connection between evidence and a specific individual or source .....
"....In addition to investigating the limits of the techniques themselves, studies should also examine sources and rates of human error...As part of this effort, more research should be done on
"contextual bias," which occurs when the results of forensic analysis are influenced by an examiner's knowledge about the suspect's background or an investigator's knowledge of a case. One study found that fingerprint examiners did not always agree even with their own past conclusions when the same evidence was presented in a different context..... "
(READ THE REST OF THIS ARTICLE AT THE LINK ABOVE. This article is dtd 2/18/09. There is also a link there to the full report by the National Research Council for the government)
This report will also apply to the "decomp air analysis". The first lab LE sent a sample to (National Center for Forensic Science in Orlando, rpt dtd 7/30/08 in the released documents) said there were not able to conclusively demonstrate that human decomposition was previously present in the auto's trunk because there were other possible sources for the materials/chemicals found in the air samples.
LE did not like that answer so they sent another sample to the Tennessee body farm (along with ORNL facilities), which trains law enforcement (and almost always testifies for the prosecution and never for a defendant) and they found something (!?) .... and they now have a report of decomposition in the trunk! However even the body farm says it is better stated as
It Could be that (See the National Research Council's report for the underlined, quoted wording). The Tennessee Body Farm report is located in the released documents.
Now all of this massive, unprecedented exposure/release of information in this case
and the prosecution slanted info leaked by "sources close to the investigation" makes sense!
Most of what the prosecution claims as evidence is easily disputed by the defense now with the congressionally ordered investigation results and the release of this report.