wedavis
Take it easy!
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2008
- Messages
- 748
- Reaction score
- 0
Gosh, I'm sorry it came across that way. It wasn't my intention at all.
Then take it easy on the bolding combined with terseness.
Gosh, I'm sorry it came across that way. It wasn't my intention at all.
It's good to have skills. :crazy:
Then take it easy on the bolding combined with terseness.
Ahhhh, Chilly :blowkiss: I too have read your posts the wrong on some ocassions! Now I know your 'style' and I appreciate it more than you know! Maybe it's because you remind me of my sister! FWIW, I don't think your'e an *advertiser censored**hole at all!:crazy:
Again I'm sorry. I bolded to point out the difference in the statements, not to criticize. Next time I'll italicize instead, maybe that will seem less terse.
The only type of immunity that could be granted would be for criminal prosecution of a crime she committed. What type of crime could she possibly have committed? Breach of a confidentiality agreement is civil not criminal, so that's not it. Letting KC do something she was forbidden to do per the terms of her bond? Failing to report something? But what? She's a bounty hunter. She has no duty to report anything. Even if KC confessed she wouldn't have a duty to report it. This should be interesting, or a red herring!
Aww now I look like a sensitive as*hole! (But I was saying your post was terse. That and the bolding seems like yelling to me - maybe I'm weird.)
Has anyone even seen what this woman looks like or if she was even seen, I dont think she was but not positive. She was kept out of the public eye very well. please correct me if im wrong..
I honestly do not believe anyone knows where Caylee is besides Casey. I think the more you try to look deeply into this the more you become wrapped around the warped mind of Casey. We need to step back and look at the basics, solidify what we do know vs what we don't. Hypotheticals need to be thrown away. Work with the facts and go from there.
We're all weird or we wouldn't be posting here No harm done. I appreciate that you brought it up so we could discuss it and not be left with hard feelings.
Aww now I look like a sensitive as*hole! (But I was saying your post was terse. That and the bolding seems like yelling to me - maybe I'm weird.)
It's good to have skills. :crazy:
It's ok. Everyone has their own way of emphasis in the written word, and some use bold and some use CAPS and some use itallics and some underline but it is all in the hopes of showing an emphasis on a particular statement or word. No offense intended from Chilly I am POSITIVE and no harm done. We are all on edge with this case as it is so bizzarro! and there are bound to be a few encounters in our midst but we are all reasonable thinking adults (right chilly?) and we get over things pretty quickly. Don't worry about seeming weird...we're all weird in our own special way...:blowkiss:
Who you callin' reasonable???? :blowkiss:
It's ok. Everyone has their own way of emphasis in the written word, and some use bold and some use CAPS and some use itallics and some underline but it is all in the hopes of showing an emphasis on a particular statement or word. No offense intended from Chilly I am POSITIVE and no harm done. We are all on edge with this case as it is so bizzarro! and there are bound to be a few encounters in our midst but we are all reasonable thinking adults (right chilly?) and we get over things pretty quickly. Don't worry about seeming weird...we're all weird in our own special way...:blowkiss:
Speaking of requests...and slightly OT...whatever happened with the prosecution's request for a gag order?
If she wore a wire and/or somehow taped them illegally, then the information would not be admissible and maybe the FBH could have been concerned that she would be prosecuted for illegally taping the A's.
Maybe the FBH gave LP info and if he uses it directly then the A's will catch on and possibly sue him, so maybe he is going to randomly search unrelated areas on "hunches" to make it less obvious that he is seaeching based off of what the FBH taped. Maybe the next "hunch" search will be the real area.
Just my crazies yabbering on and on and on...sorry if it makes no sense to anyone else.
I think that may be the way to weed things out. But how.