dc20015
Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2012
- Messages
- 188
- Reaction score
- 17
Well, we know, he ordered a prostitute to his house while ha had the drifter there and he risked the question about his sex intentions in the lie detector test and he said, he had no intention and it cam back inconclusive (which is one of the two points, that made the whole shebang inconclusive).
So common sense, he ordered her for some kind of sex. That doesn't necessary mean, HE wanted to sleep with her.
I was just responding to a post by another user who had used Joseph Brewer's claims and asked a follow-up question. All I was saying was that I'm not prepared to take his word as gospel and that any thing or mix of things could've happened in that house, sexually and otherwise. The inconclusiveness of his answers only makes me feel more that way because IC polygraph results aren't considered to be very revealing either way. I was also pointing out that this is a totally one-sided tale because the hired party here is now deceased. And none of these other guys are going to talk unless they have to, if indeed the girl met with foul play. Anyway, it's one man's word against the wind, basically.
But, personally, of course I think she was hired for sex and there's a possibility maybe it wasn't for Brewer. My main point was we don't know. I have my own opinions and I'll share them, but I'm just a person who is huge on we don't really know until we know if we ever know. All sorts of strange things happen in this world.