I've wondered about that too. If she still had a passlock on his phone, there'd be no use for him to take it with him although with my iPhone I can answer incoming calls without passlock interference. If she was handcuffing him to the bed as he told LE, when did she do this? He agreed to it for a six month period but beginning when? Immediately around Nov 1 when we see TM texts to HE, during the 3wk California trip that I'm 'guestimating' began right after Thanksgiving and they returned Dec 14-16 (?exact date), after the return? All of the above?
So if she was handcuffing him to the bed at this time period, why was he roaming pay phones at 1:30? Well, according to SM text to TM family, there was the mention of TM needing to get sober, words to that effect. (text shown during bond hearing) I have no clue what her DoC may be, if any, but IF she flaked/faded out before shackling him, maybe he just cut and run quick as he could, again I suspect NOT having his phone with him.
Maybe he called from 10th because he was looking for HE at TK, 10th isn't far from BATB. He didnt know where her new apartment was, AFAIK. I actually question the IE charges because we have heard they are result of what SM told police. I'm not convinced there were any IE incidents unless they are on tape. I think he may have been cruising BATB but not for a spot to hanky-panky w/TM but just looking for Heather.
Remember when the OJ charges came and a lot of us questioned and speculated the wording; it was that SM lied about where he was and TM lied about where she AND SM were....I think SM was alone at those places, looking for Heather, and later recalling where he went and afraid he may be caught on camera after whatever happened at PTL happened and made up the sex in the car story to cover why he was there, and TM backed him up.
Whole lotta :moo::moo::moo::moo:'s there.