There is glaring, obvious evidence of an intruder, namely, the ransom note which was not written by anyone in the Ramsey household and most certainly did not write itself. Please think about what you are saying.
Unless you were a credible witness as the note was being written, and are prepared to make your assessment public, verifiable knowledge, then you might consider 'thinking about what you are saying'.
This is a public forum, and I, for one, am open to any
opinions that are supported by the factual, proven evidence we have seen at this juncture. If it can one day be proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, at a trial, that an Intruder(s) was responsible for the death of JonBenet, then we will finally have a
true victory - which is the justice we are so desperately seeking for her.
Most of us
usually (and I emphasize this because I allow for emotions running high at times) quantify our comments or statements in the discussion threads as being: speculation, opinions, or even uninformed rationale. We do this by using words and phrases such as, "in my opinion", "I believe", "I speculate", "I feel" or "I think", just to name a few. We share theories and ideas using this format because to make comments in using phrases such as "it was", "she is", "did not", etc., we would then be relating certainty and to do that we must have absolute conviction of that knowledge, and consider it a true fact.
I can only surmise something to be factual to me if I see it with my own eyes. (Notice, I said surmise, because a good magician is quite experienced at making us think something is true even when it is not.) I can accept certain other information as true fact if I am convinced the source of that information is credible by either former validation or has a proven reputation for correct assessment.
So, if you decide to 'think about what you are saying' in future posts, you might want to consider altering your comments to be those of speculation or opinions, since otherwise as we read through your information,
some of us are being led to believe either you
do have factual information that is being withheld from authorities, or your comments are being
purposefully crafted to erode the RDI camp, rather than to offer insight that might be valuable in our 'sleuthing' process.
If you will indulge my suggestion, I will offer this edit of your statement above: "There is, IMO,
glaring, obvious evidence of a possible intruder, namely,
the ransom note, which cannot with 100% accuracy be scientifically proven to have been written by anyone in the Ramsey household and most certainly did not write itself. Please think about what you are saying." The use of the word "Please" in your last sentence now imparts respect for others, rather than emphasizes what was,
I FEEL (see above), an arrogant chastisement.
In plain English, bring yourself down off your self-imposed, all-knowing pedestal, play by the rules of respect, courtesy and clearly stated
opinions or questions, and
some of us will look forward to hearing your reasoning as to why you can cling to an intruder theory. I'll state it again, but with different words, I doubt there is even one poster in the entire forum who would not WELCOME the final proof and conviction of an Intruder(s) in the death of JonBenet Ramsey.
May she rest in peace.