Well Cox is just a blowhard in my book, until someone puts something out there that would convince me differently I wont waste my time on him. Its evident the SPD isnt pressing him anymore either, they havent talked to him in 15 years.
Perhaps he is a blowhard. Many people hold to that view and it is reasonable to have that opinion. I'm not sure that it has been 15 years since they had contact with him. I assume you have verified that period of time. I'll accept that as fact, however. Do you have a better suspect or suspects in mind? You needn't name them if you don't feel comfortable. And could you provide a scenario that would tie this person or persons to the case. As you may recall we used to discuss this and the possibility of a burglary was opined. In view of the fact that the money was left behind, do you still believe that is more likely the probability?Well Cox is just a blowhard in my book, until someone puts something out there that would convince me differently I wont waste my time on him. Its evident the SPD isn't pressing him anymore either, they haven't talked to him in 15 years.
Extending that here, in this case, accepting Suzie as the ‘driver’ gives rise to much of this thinking. There would have been a LOT of things she COULD have done to derail the inevitable; flip the truck over, run into another car, run into any brightly lit area with any people around, get out running at the porch lady scene (it’s still possible even if we disagree on time and detail seen, although I presume the truck turn around was close to her). Yes, I’ll agree Cox, and other perps could subdue three women. Just that PART of this success is and HAS been due to the fact of disbelief of the ugly inevitable. Just a touch of conciliatory passivity is a deadly thing. By the way, in ANY of these cases as well as others similar, I’m placing NO blame on the victims for their fate, just offer a possible explanation.
You may be right. But can you expand on that how to place the timeline that he couldn't have carried out this crime? I haven't really changed my mind about Cox but trying to have an open mind I wanted to be "fair" to include Revak as well. I'd appreciate if you would help me eliminate Revak.I have never considered Revaks a viable suspect in this crime. If you look at that statement the timeline makes it impossible.
Another FYI...true to form on these cable channels, there are multiple showings of this program. The first on Monday March 7th at 8 PM Central. Then the replay (I guess for the West Coast) at 11 PM Central. Another showing on Sunday March 13th at 5 PM Central (don't forget to 'Spring ahead' by then). That should cover everyone for DVR, recording conflicts.
Interestingly enough, like the other episodes, it's 'TV-PG,' but unlike the other shows, remarks (L) Language in addition to what the others have of (V) violence.
http://investigation.discovery.com/tv-schedules/series.html?paid=141.15379.132227.40769.x
Hi, MM.
I knew you would notice the car dealer confirmation. That comes down to the possibility that Stacy was the target, not Sherrill or Suzie. If Stacy was the target, then the abductor/murderer woukd have necessarily followed the girls home from somewhere or would have seen that the two girls were togsther earlier in the evening and then just checked their houses until he spotted them. It could also be that the girls stopped for cigarettes or snacks on their way home and were noticed. So it is possible that Stacy might have attracted Cox's atte tnion that night, somehow.
I am really thinking about gaia's point. What if Janelle's early calls were either during the abduction or JUST AFTER? That is, it would be much easier to understand how someone got in if it was daylight or nearly so. A knock at the door might have been assumed to be Mike and Janelle (and other friends). Sherrill answers the door, sees a van and a youngish man at the
door, and assumes it is the kids coming for the girls. Or Sherrill lets the dog out and sees the van and assumes people are waiting for the girls. She goes back inside but doesn't relock the door--it's morning and the girls will be leaving. Once the door is unlocked, the bad guy is in.
Stacy is still in her t-shirt and panties because she and Susie aren't up yet. Five minutes later they are in the van and "disappeared."
I tried to look at the original police report link but all the old articles are off the newspaper site and are now "for pay." I will have to dig them out of my files. Really the whole time line depends on Janelle--when she says the girls left, when she says she started calling. And we can't really assume that getting no answer means that the wome.pn were already gone.