HarvestMoon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2005
- Messages
- 3,120
- Reaction score
- 1,240
Looks like a Speedo to me. G.................. that is one ugly person.
darn, I just spit my tea out, for real.
Looks like a Speedo to me. G.................. that is one ugly person.
Hm?
He wasn't being asked to verbally read it. He was asked to read it himself. Which he did, eventually.
I may become paranoid that I'm unknowingly acting belligerent. Someone poke me if I start to act up.
You are correct CH wanted to read the email TA sent him that made CH reply the way he did. DA said it wasn't important just read.
Why would he refuse to read it to himself? I bet if he had to read it outloud he would not want to. Clearly there are things that CH does not want out like him saying to Flores tha he could see Travis throwing Jodi into a wall....also Sky,s emails alluding to her believing the pedo stuff
RBBM, My apologies, I havent really been following here during this trial. I was just curious, sorry if I offended. Peace.
Here is the clip of the e-mail thing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4bTzT-c0DI#t=31m00s
While not to the extent of GS, he did the same thing.
I'm not following.the rest went into chambers.
he was hesitant.
Let the man hesitate as long as he wants. What he says goes on the record.
ohaaaaaaaaaaai :wave:
I'm not following.
He was asked to review the evidence. Not to verbally read it aloud. He was refusing to even review the evidence, saying he wanted the whole thing. He eventually conceded and started reading it (to himself)/reviewing it, as requested.
Thank you for the link to the minutes (sorry right now not sure who posted it). I may be late on this info but interesting to note, the defense dropped their objection to the State's motion to preclude the (forged) emails in the line before they were actually precluded.
So why is Nurmi NOW indicating,even outside the presence of the jury, that they could be valid. Hmmmm...something's not right here.:waitasec:
I think it's also possible that the DA knows who the person is and figured GS wouldn't mind revealing the name under seal.
Thank you for the link to the minutes (sorry right now not sure who posted it). I may be late on this info but interesting to note, the defense dropped their objection to the State's motion to preclude the (forged) emails in the line before they were actually precluded.
So why is Nurmi NOW indicating,even outside the presence of the jury, that they could be valid. Hmmmm...something's not right here.:waitasec:
I don't think there was anyone who overheard the conversation and I think the prosecutor knows it for a fact. jmo
DA said that the prosecution didn't want it in, now they do.
No, they didn't, lol. I meant that's why he didn't get arrested.
He wanted to read it in context to refresh his recollection. Nothing wrong with that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not following.
He was asked to review the evidence. Not to verbally read it aloud. He was refusing to even review the evidence, saying he wanted the whole thing. He eventually conceded and started reading it (to himself)/reviewing it, as requested.
Regarding the Gas cans, I think she used them to refuel into and out of Mesa so she wouldn't leave a trail on video or paper.