thedeviledadvocate
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2009
- Messages
- 761
- Reaction score
- 1
When JB had GB under cross, he was trying to get GB to say that GB had scraped food from the containers. JA called for a sidebar, and JB was not allowed to follow that line of questioning. Legally, GB and JA successfully dodged the answers to the question of whether or not food had been in the trash bag. There is no question that there was no food on the containers once they were placed in the drying room. GB did not have to answer the question, did you remove any food from the containers prior to placing them in the drying room. Legally he did not have to, but the question was never asked or answered. Does, not providing the answer to that question prove there was no food in the maggot infested white trash bag, legally yes, but does that remove reasonable doubt as to whether there was food in there, for most yes, for me, not so much.
Without food being in the white trash bag, we have what exactly in evidence that caused the odor? We have a single hair with apparent decomp, but I doubt that has any odor at all. We have an adipocere like fatty substance in the white trash bag, that can't be the odor according to everyone because when the trash bag was removed the odor remained. We also have trace scrapings of butyric acid from the carpet. There was no other physical evidence found in the carpet of the trunk, no blood, no decompositional fluid, none of the right kind of flies or casings, nothing except some trace scrapings of butryic acid. So I must then believe that these trace scrapings of butyric acid are the cause of the horrendous odor, right? There is nothing else in the trunk is there? The FBI says what they analyzed from the carpet was normal, and no blood or decomp fluids. The only other evidence from the trunk was in the air of the trunk, that had shockingly high levels of chloroform. I do not believe it is possible to clean a carpet in a trunk that had enough decomp fluid in it to make the stain in the carpet, so thoroughly that the only thing the FBI could find in that carpet were some traces of butyric acid. To me that is unbelieveable. If one believes that the above proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Caylee was indeed in the trunk for 3 days, then believing the odor was the smell of death is a logical assumption. If one believes the above does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Caylee was indeed in the trunk for 3 days, then believing the odor came from the white trash bag is a logical assumption.
One quick question about the longevity and unmistakeable odor of death. If the smell of death never goes away, then how did the highly trained noses of the cadaver dogs alert to that unmistakeable, longlasting odor one day, and not alert the very next day in the same place? Even if CSI's had moved some of the dirt to the side while searching, they did not remove it from the area, so if that unmistakeable, longlasting, unremovable odor the cadaver dogs alerted to was part of the ground, why did they not alert to the pile of dirt the next day? This does not seem to have a logical answer.
As always, my entire post is my opinion only.
Without food being in the white trash bag, we have what exactly in evidence that caused the odor? We have a single hair with apparent decomp, but I doubt that has any odor at all. We have an adipocere like fatty substance in the white trash bag, that can't be the odor according to everyone because when the trash bag was removed the odor remained. We also have trace scrapings of butyric acid from the carpet. There was no other physical evidence found in the carpet of the trunk, no blood, no decompositional fluid, none of the right kind of flies or casings, nothing except some trace scrapings of butryic acid. So I must then believe that these trace scrapings of butyric acid are the cause of the horrendous odor, right? There is nothing else in the trunk is there? The FBI says what they analyzed from the carpet was normal, and no blood or decomp fluids. The only other evidence from the trunk was in the air of the trunk, that had shockingly high levels of chloroform. I do not believe it is possible to clean a carpet in a trunk that had enough decomp fluid in it to make the stain in the carpet, so thoroughly that the only thing the FBI could find in that carpet were some traces of butyric acid. To me that is unbelieveable. If one believes that the above proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Caylee was indeed in the trunk for 3 days, then believing the odor was the smell of death is a logical assumption. If one believes the above does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Caylee was indeed in the trunk for 3 days, then believing the odor came from the white trash bag is a logical assumption.
One quick question about the longevity and unmistakeable odor of death. If the smell of death never goes away, then how did the highly trained noses of the cadaver dogs alert to that unmistakeable, longlasting odor one day, and not alert the very next day in the same place? Even if CSI's had moved some of the dirt to the side while searching, they did not remove it from the area, so if that unmistakeable, longlasting, unremovable odor the cadaver dogs alerted to was part of the ground, why did they not alert to the pile of dirt the next day? This does not seem to have a logical answer.
As always, my entire post is my opinion only.