MurriFlower
Inactive
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2010
- Messages
- 1,980
- Reaction score
- 15
RDI is not a state of mind and I resent that.
Well, this is my 'opinion'. No one makes you believe RDI, don't say you have no choice.
Noone wants to believe that this is what transpired but this is where the evidence leads.
Let's see, no motive, passed a lie detector test, DNA from an unknown male, cord and tape from an unknown source, handwriting on RN not proven. Nope, no evidence leads there as far as I can see.
All the hoopla and what ifs.... and what could be possible... that an intruder came in.... clouds common sense of where the evidence leads.Every scenario can have an alternate scenario if creative enough.
Exactly my point. Every scenario can have an alternative. I am IDI because I believe the Rs didn't do it. It is my 'state of mind'. I will therefore explore all the 'what ifs', 'what could be possibles' available to us to try to identify the intruder(s) responsible.
After all this time Boulder should just put it all out there and see what happens. I hate knowing that much is tabloid fiction when we can have true facts. Lets face it, it is alot cheaper to put out the actual case facts then hold them back until a special investigation team gets funded. The community will be able to sniff out something if it not too late.
Yep, I agree. They've taken it pretty much as far as they can unless they are relying on future advances in technology to re-evaluate the evidence. I don't think there would be much to lose by letting us have it all (that's assuming there IS actually more to have LOL).